Re: [kfreebsd] massive report for uninstallable FUSE packages

2011-07-16 Thread David Bremner
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 16:10:18 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > wikipediafs sshfs smbnetfs s3ql rofs python-fuse pytagsfs plptools > mythtvfs ntfsprogs libpam-mount libfuse-perl libconfig-model-perl > httpfs2 gphotofs gfarm2fs fusedav fts flickrfs curlftpfs bindfs avfs > aptfs I'm working on gphotofs

Re: mprotect, SIGBUS, and SIGSEGV

2011-05-11 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 11 May 2011 07:10:41 +0200 (CEST), Petr Salinger wrote: > > Build environment of used eglibc (MIN_KERNEL_SUPPORTED), > but not build environment of your binary. > Got it, thanks. I guess there is some good reason why this doesn't change the soname of libc, since it seems to break the

Re: mprotect, SIGBUS, and SIGSEGV

2011-05-10 Thread David Bremner
On Tue, 10 May 2011 22:13:45 +0200 (CEST), Petr Salinger wrote: > What about catching both signals ? I proposed this to upstream. I'm not sure what they will think about that idea. > There is no way, signal is determined by eglibc compiled for. > Lets assume that your binary is compiled under

mprotect, SIGBUS, and SIGSEGV

2011-05-10 Thread David Bremner
While working on getting the racket garbage collector working on kFreeBSD, I (well, really upstream) noticed mprotect was sending SIGBUS. Recently this changed so that it is sending SIGSEGV. I'm not sure what exactly changed, except that catching SIGBUS works on squeeze and catching SIGSEGV works