Package: ftp.debian.org
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org, aure...@debian.org, r...@debian.org,
stev...@debian.org
Severity: normal
Control: affects -1 src:freebsd-glue
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
The kfreebsd-* ports have been rem
Package: ftp.debian.org
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org, aure...@debian.org, r...@debian.org,
stev...@debian.org
Severity: normal
Control: affects -1 src:freebsd-libs
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
The kfreebsd-* ports have been rem
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org, aure...@debian.org, r...@debian.org,
stev...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:freebsd-buildutils
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
The kfreebsd-* ports have be
* Jessica Clarke:
> > *sigh* What is the plan for building binutils on real FreeBSD? Because
> > that has a libctf (albeit, now at .2) in the base system that will
> > conflict. Is this just a GNU-written replacement we should disable in
> > binutils on kfreebsd-*? Presumably that’s what they do on
Hi,
> your package currently Depends on bsdmainutils, which has become a
> transitional
> package.
>
> Please change the dependency to one of the replacement packages:
[..]
Is there any progress on this? Could we please get this done?
Thanks,
Chris
Hi,
* Cyril Brulebois :
> Michael Biebl (2017-10-24):
> > But there is one complication: I noticed that eject in util-linux
> > currently linux only.
> >
> > If we made the udeb linux-any, how would this affect the installer?
>
> It might mean a regression on kfreebsd-* (I don't see an eject-
6 matches
Mail list logo
