Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> tags -1 + patch
> thanks
Sorry about that. I knew this was a relatively risky change, but
thought I had test cases covering everything. Would you mind adding a
regression test for this case?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
This sentence contradicts itself - no actuall
On Sat, 2018-09-29 at 17:05 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 9/29/18 8:48 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 14:16 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Furthermore, several of the ports are in very healthy condition and
> &g
a year or so before someone and fixed them.
[...]
So, by all means have fun working on these ports, but aside from ppc64
I don't see any prospect of them meeting release qualifications.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism. - Harrison
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 2016-10-01 at 15:48 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 10/01/2016 02:17 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > This isn't the case for PowerPC32 where upstream development is still very
> > > active because it's part of the P
into shape which is why I hope
> we can add sparc64 as an official port soon.
[...]
Oracle cares about Solaris on SPARC, not Linux on SPARC.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Klipstein's 4th Law of Prototyping and Production:
A fail-safe circuit will destroy
others.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
't need multiarch:
[...]
This is only the case because ppc64 has a lower level of support
(unofficial port) than powerpc (release architecture). The 64-bit
kernel package should be dropped once powerpc is at the same or lower
level of support than ppc64 - just as we've done for i386, s390
andom, but credited as providing only a fraction of a bit of
entropy.
get_random_bytes() was changed to not use an architectural HWRNG.
get_random_int() and get_random_bytes_arch() will use it and it is
documented that they are not suitable for cryptographic purposes.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Knowledge is power. France is bacon.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
a64 and other big updates.
>
> So please, keep ia64 in the bandwagon ;-)
But I don't think ia64 is well-supported even in wheezy. The kernel
doesn't boot on some common machines and no-one seems to be able to fix
it.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
compatible: Gracefully accepts erroneous data from any source
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
check this in advance.
Sorry about that.
If there are particular changes that cause a lot of breakage, they could
be reverted temporarily.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism. - Harrison
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
on-$flavour-di/lib/modules/$installedname/");
}
elsif (-e "$sourcedir/boot/kfreebsd-$installedname.gz") {
doit("install", "-D", "-m", 644,
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 1959853..3fb4257 100644
--- a/debian/chan
index 6bebe43..1959853 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ kernel-wedge (2.85) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
* gen-deps: Ignore dependencies in default package-list that are
overridden by the architecture package-list (Closes: #678587)
+ * find-unpackaged: New
tecture package-list (Closes: #678587)
+
+ -- Ben Hutchings Sun, 24 Jun 2012 19:34:25 +0100
+
kernel-wedge (2.84) unstable; urgency=low
[ Joey Hess ]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I'm intending to commit the following changes and upload a new version
of kernel-wedge. Let me know if you see any problems with them.
Ben.
Ben Hutchings (3):
gen-deps: Ignore default dependencies that are overridden
per-architecture
List the unpackaged modules
install-files: In
-elf.raid.o.uu
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: kfreebsd-8
Version: 8.1-5
Severity: serious
The following C files contain firmware images in binary-equivalent form
but are not obviously accompanied by the corresponding source code:
sys/contrib/dev/ral/rt2661_ucode.h
- binaries are packaged in firmware-ralink as /lib/firmware/ralink/rt
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:51 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
[...]
> On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 18:48:20 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > 4. During a kernel package installation, upgrade or removal, various
> > boot loader hooks may be invoked (in this order):
> >
> > a. A p
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 14:16 +0100, Gregor Jasny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm the maintainer of libv4l which passed the new queue yesterday.
> Obviously the package build failed on non-Linux architectures [1]. How
> do I handle this situation? Should I list all supported architectures in
> the control fi
17 matches
Mail list logo
