Re: Glibc upload this weekend

On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 03:05:11PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: > I would like to do a glibc upload this weekend. > > The diff from glibc-2.3.1 to current CVS is over 6 Megs. As such, > there's no way we can reasonable pull from it. Why not? It is quite frequent to do exactly that. I guarantee you

Re: Glibc 2.3 pre-releases

> sparc: Sparc is me. Getting it tonight. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/

Last call for glibc patches against 2.2.5

Ok, I have some fixes for m68k, hppa. So I need to get a 2.2.5-2 out really quick. If any architectures needs to get me some patches, send them quickly. -- .--===-=-==-=---==-=-. / Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux

Re: Bootstrapping Debian GNU/Linux distribution on SuperH

ist for "port" discussions. it is an alias to all debian- mailing lists (sparc, alpha, m68k, i386, etc.), so it makes little sense to discuss the SuperH port on 20 or so mailing lists. Ben -- .--===-=-==-=---==-=-. / Ben Collins

Re: boot-floppies for stable

#x27;t know anything about the other archs. > > Arch's in question: alpha, arm, m68k, sparc. I'm going to build sparc soonish. -- ---===-=-==-=-------==-=-- / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux

Re: Where is the autobuilder?

use it on sparc-ports. cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/CVS login cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/CVS co wanna-build -- ---===-=-==-=---=====----=-=-- / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: m68k buildd presents significant problem for non-us and testing

too: > > alpha:Feb 15 ok > arm: Nov 20 > m68k: Jan 10 > mips: Feb 15 ok > powerpc:Feb 14ok > sparc:Jan 29 > > This holds a lot of nonus stuff from going into testing. I'll take care of sparc shortly. -- ---===-=-==-=

Re: call for ports to begin using 2.4.0 headers for glibc

On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 03:26:03PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 11:05:39PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > Well, the big deal is that to enable LFS on glibc, it must be compiled > > against 2.4.0 headers. This does not break when running on 2.2.x >

Re: call for ports to begin using 2.4.0 headers for glibc

On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 10:50:47AM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote: > On Mon 15 Jan 2001, Ben Collins wrote: > > > Well, the big deal is that to enable LFS on glibc, it must be compiled > > against 2.4.0 headers. This does not break when running on 2.2.x > > AFAIK, if LFS is

call for ports to begin using 2.4.0 headers for glibc

Ben -- ---===-=-==-=---==-=-- / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'

Revival of the port specific -changes lists

devel--changes" (unstable and frozen): m68k sparc hurd-i386 i386 arm alpha powerpc If you need these setup for your arch, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Ben -- ---===-=-==-=---=====----=-=-- / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic v

Now Alpha too (was Re: New glibc 2.1.92 test packages (i386, powerpc, sparc))

se packages are now also available. Thanks. FYI, you can install these packages and then downgrade back to potato packages without any problems (just make sure to reinstall ldso since ldconfig is now supplied by libc6, or libc6.1 in alpha's case). Thanks, Ben -- ---===-=-==

New glibc 2.1.92 test packages (i386, powerpc, sparc)

g set. -- ---===-=-==-=---==-=-- / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---' pgpczd8WqBZbq.pgp Description: PGP signature