Hi,
Having a Debian Linux installation with dropbear for pre-boot unlocking
of encrypted partitions (including root [and everything except for
/boot] on LVM). The disk partitions actually being mirrors created
using mdadm (RAID1) and then encrypted using cryptsetup (dm-crypt).
How would one go a
Hi,
On 20/03/2016 8:49 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
> Does Ubuntu even use systemd? I think they use runit or something.
> Something start*... it escapes me.
Due to Ubuntu being heavily based on Debian, they chose to change to
systemd going forward; I'm not sure if that has changed or not, but the
stre
Hi,
On 21/03/2016 1:03 AM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>> The other part of the problem is that Debian/KfreeBSD is no longer an
>> officially supported version of Debian; unofficially it has support, but
>> not officially.
>
> Debian's re
Hi,
On 20/03/2016 7:35 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
> Wouldn't it have better to focus on developing Debian GNU/kFreeBSD,
> which could do with the extra attention/work?
>
> Just curious. What was the rationale?
The other part of the problem is that Debian/KfreeBSD is no longer an
officially supported
Hi,
On 20/03/2016 12:16 AM, Jon Boden wrote:
> ubuntuBSD just went live today with its first release, v15.04 BETA1
> (codenamed "Escape from SystemD").
>
> This project owes a lot to Debian GNU/kFreeBSD and I'd like to send you a
> sincere offer for collaboration.
>
> In the following days I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Steven,
On 10/11/2014 10:15 AM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> We discussed kfreebsd at length, but are not satisfied that a
>> release with Jessie will be of sufficient quality. We are dropping
>> it as an official rele
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
First off, thank you very much Steven.
On 14/10/2014 10:02 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 13/10/14 19:04, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>> So, is there currently ANY concern that kFreeBSD won't continue
>> for Jessie and/or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 1/10/2014 6:35 AM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 30/09/14 20:03, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> The remaining concern would be having enough people involved. I'm
> certainly not the only active developer; Christoph has been testing and
>
files.
Then, shouldn't that be 6.0.2a just like which occurred previously to
result in 6.0.1a to replace 6.0.1
--
Kind Regards
AndrewM
Andrew McGlashan
Broadband Solutions now including VoIP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
9 matches
Mail list logo
