freebsd would be ignored (assuming the os
is linux).
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 09:07:18PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
>
> On 07-Jul-2002 Andres Salomon wrote:
> > I've started work on this, but I figured I'd shoot an email to the list
> > for sugg
from
scratch.
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 03:53:17PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> If RH already uses /etc/makedev.d, why not start with their
> application?
>
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 06:16:04PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > Looking at redhat's makedev, they h
I've started work on this, but I figured I'd shoot an email to the list
for suggestions/comments. The current makedev script (/sbin/MAKEDEV) is
rather lacking in a few respects:
1) It does a nasty 'eval "major_$device=$major"', where $device and
$major come from /proc/devices, for every single de
Blech; it would appear fakeroot does an explicit dlopen of
/lib/libc.so.6. Since I don't have root in your chroot, and, well,
fakeroot doesn't work, try changing LIBCPATH at the top of libfakeroot.c
to /usr/lib/libc.so.12 and recompiling..
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 11:02:22PM +, Matthew Garre
I'm one of those rare people that likes a Cc:, regardless of whether
I'm on a list or not. I read mailing lists when I'm bored; if someone
replies to me via list, I won't immediately respond. OTOH, if I'm
Cc'd, I'll get a copy of the email in my inbox (of which I'll be
informed about immediately
Just how different are the kernels themselves? I use openbsd, and I've
used freebsd.. Why not aim for all 3, if possible?
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 09:59:01PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
>
> What kernel should we aim for first?
>
I only recently subscribed to this list. The last time I heard
about debian-bsd, there was a rather large flamewar about the
legal implications of it. What was the result of that?
Which bsd was the maintainer working on, and could the files
in the debian maintainer's home directory be made publi
7 matches
Mail list logo
