Hi!
Am 16.01.2012 19:18, schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Why not enabling others having the experience to have
> fixed a bug on freebsd? The package is team maintained.
To cite you in the mail which started this thread:
> any hint, how to fix this problem?
And the previous mail you claimed you can't
Hi!
Am 16.01.2012 18:09, schrieb Andreas Tille:
>> ... and voila! You can indeed fix (or at least investigate further)
>> these bugs while sitting before a Linux box.
> Well, what your are summerizing with a "voila" is quite a bit of work [..]
Well, actually it is:
1) Looking up a server name
2
Hi!
Am 15.01.2012 08:54, schrieb Andreas Tille:
> any hint, how to fix this problem?
Well, in your first answer to the bug report you wrote:
> Could you give any hint because it is a bit hard to
> reproduce if you are sitting on a Linux box. Any help is welcome.
Luckily you don't have to! Th
Hi Robert!
* Robert Millan [111207 14:46]:
> Due to dependency on udev (see attached patch)
I just checked, and while that makes the package installable, it sadly
doesn't make it usable. On my kfreebsd test machine I get after
applying your patch:
debian:~# ntfs-config
Traceback (most recent
tag 651112 patch pending
tag 630209 patch pending
tag 617659 patch pending
thanks
Hi!
Am 06.12.2011 13:34, schrieb Alexander Reichle-Schmehl:
>>> So adding automake-1.9 to the build depends would solve the FTBFS on the
>>> buildds?
>> Probably.
>> Or extend 01_s
tags 651112 +unreproducible
thanks
Hi!
As last uploader of this package I took a look at this bug, but I failed
to reproduce it. On both io.debian.net and asdfasdf.debian.net the
package compiles just fine (see attached build logs) in the sid chroots.
Missing knowledge of kfreebsd and our build
Hi!
Am 16.06.2011 14:37, schrieb Robert Millan:
> We really need a fix for this. Is there no faster way than waiting
> for libgeom1 to pass through NEW?
Well, for a start you can ping the ftp-team to fastrack the package if
it's so important.
Best regards,
Alexander, who just did that
--
Hi!
Am 16.06.2011 12:28, schrieb Robert Millan:
>> Tested the mentioned image in vmware. I too encountered a problem when
>> creating an ufs file system. From the syslos:
>>
>> update-dev: warning: unable to find udevadm; skipping
>> partman: mkfsuf:
>> partman: /dev/da0S1: could not find espec
Hi!
Am 16.06.2011 11:23, schrieb Alan Braslau:
> I had attempted (unsuccessfully) yesterday to install kfreebsd-amd64
> using the D-I daily build. It failed upon creation of the ufs file
> system. I just tried again with today's image - same problem.
>
> I finally succeeded using the stable mi
Hi Bahman!
Am 10.02.2011 06:20, schrieb Bahman Kahinpour:
> I was planning to download Debian GNU/kFreeBSD 6.0 today in order to
> test it to see if it's ready for deployment on server platforms that I
> noticed something. The download links are:
>
> http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.0/kfr
Hi!
Am 03.02.2011 12:41, schrieb Axel Beckert:
>> -ports·to·the·FreeBSD·kernel·using·the·known·Debian/GNU·userland:
>> +ports·to·the·kernel·of·FreeBSD·project using·the·known·Debian/GNU
>> +userland:
> Shouldn't it be "ports·to·the·kernel·of·the·FreeBSD·project"?
>
Hi!
Am 03.02.2011 09:35, schrieb Robert Millan:
> I suggest this small change, otherwise the text seems to suggest that
> FreeBSD is a kernel.
Thanks, done as:
-ports·to·the·FreeBSD·kernel·using·the·known·Debian/GNU·userland:
+ports·to·the·kernel·of·FreeBSD·project using·the·known·Debian/GNU
+u
=publicity&view=log
Best regards,
Alexander
- Forwarded message from Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
-
From: Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Subject: Please review content squeeze release announement
To: debian-public...@lists.debian.org, debian-proj...@lists.debian.org
Cc: debi
Hi!
Am 29.09.2010 08:16, schrieb Brian Gupta:
> This leaves me pretty hopeful that this should work for VMWare Workstation,
> and ESXi which means our testing userbase is potentially pretty large.
Just tested with Vmware Workstation 7.1.2 and today daily installer: It
works, no problems encount
Hi!
While looking through Axel's slides (adopting them for the CeBIT talks),
I came up with some questions he couldn't easily answer. So I ask them
here; hopefully someone can give me easy enough answers so that I
understand them ;)
About the topic "Why not a BSD libc?" he wrote: "Adapting
Hi!
Petr Salinger schrieb:
Is possible to run from another console in apropriate chroot "dpkg
--purge traceroute-nanog" ?
It's possible, but doesn't solve the problem, as d-i doesn't want to
continue until debootstrap finished successful, and debootstrap will
restart it all again, after jum
Hi!
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl schrieb:
As I install in a virtualbox with only a NATed network, I have currently
problems saving the logs somewhere else to provide you with it.
Here it is:
http://www.schmehl.info/tmp/syslog-di-kfreebsd
Oh, and please CC-me as I'm not yet on this
Hi!
It seems that the debian-installer is currently broken (all versions),
as debootstrap fails to install the base system. Looking at the logs it
looks like it tries to install traceroute-nanog, which is now a dummy
package to install the "real" traceroute package, which doesn't exists
on k
[ Please cc me, as I'm not subscribed to this list ]
Hi!
As you might have heard we got asked, if we would like to submit a talk
proposal for the "Open Source Forum" at this years CeBIT. I think a
small introduction to the kFreeBSD port might be a good idea. Since
it's certainly something new a
19 matches
Mail list logo
