Re: Bug#825514: GNU/kFreeBSD patch for openjdk-8

2016-06-13 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Steven Chamberlain wrote: > I wonder though, in this context, is it referring to the kernel (so we > should return "BSD" here) or userland traits (we are actually more like > (GNU/)"LINUX"). In this context, the only difference it makes is whether to use vfork() or posix_spawn(). Linux and FreeBS

Re: Bug#825514: GNU/kFreeBSD patch for openjdk-8

2016-06-13 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, Jon Boden wrote: > We had the exact same problem on ubuntuBSD and fixed it with this patch: > > https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntubsd/ubuntubsd/patches-xenial/download/jon%40ubuntubsd.org-20160613204145-fp9vhvrndudghxhj/openjdk8.diff-20160613204118-vadi6g4wfrmictbr-1/openjdk-8.diff Thank y

GNU/kFreeBSD patch for openjdk-8

2016-06-13 Thread Jon Boden
Hi We had the exact same problem on ubuntuBSD and fixed it with this patch: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntubsd/ubuntubsd/patches-xenial/download/jon%40ubuntubsd.org-20160613204145-fp9vhvrndudghxhj/openjdk8.diff-20160613204118-vadi6g4wfrmictbr-1/openjdk-8.diff I think it should work on Debi

Bug#827221: fix bind9 on kfreebsd-amd64

2016-06-13 Thread Jon Boden
Package: bind9 Version: 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-10 Tags: patch Hi bind9 build fails on kfreebsd-amd64 because threading is disabled: checking for PKCS11 support... yes configure: error: PKCS11 requires thread support debian/rules:50: recipe for target 'stamps/configure' failed make: *** [stamps/configu

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-13 Thread Niels Thykier
Philipp Kern: > On 2016-06-05 12:01, Niels Thykier wrote: >> * amd64, i386, armel, armhf, arm64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, >>s390x >>- *No* blockers at this time from RT, DSA nor security. >>- s390, ppc64el and all arm ports have DSA concerns. > > What is the current DSA concern