kfreebsd-10_10.3~svn296998-1_multi.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2016-03-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 20:49:47 + Source: kfreebsd-10 Binary: kfreebsd-source-10.3 kfreebsd-headers-10.3-0 kfreebsd-image-10.3-0-amd64 kfreebsd-image-10-amd64 kfreebsd-headers-10.3-0-amd64 kfreebsd-headers-10-amd64 ker

Bug#818777: marked as done (kfreebsd-10: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.9))

2016-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2016 23:25:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#818777: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn296998-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #818777, regarding kfreebsd-10: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.9) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#818700: marked as done (allow non-numerical suffixes in version numbers)

2016-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2016 23:25:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#818700: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn296998-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #818700, regarding allow non-numerical suffixes in version numbers to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#818426: marked as done (kfreebsd-10: CVE-2016-1885: incorrect argument validation in sysarch(2))

2016-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2016 23:25:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#818426: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn296998-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #818426, regarding kfreebsd-10: CVE-2016-1885: incorrect argument validation in sysarch(2) to be marked as done. This means that

Processing of kfreebsd-10_10.3~svn296998-1_multi.changes

2016-03-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
kfreebsd-10_10.3~svn296998-1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kfreebsd-10_10.3~svn296998-1.dsc kfreebsd-10_10.3~svn296998.orig.tar.xz kfreebsd-10_10.3~svn296998-1.debian.tar.xz kfreebsd-source-10.3_10.3~svn296998-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debi

Processing of kfreebsd-10_10.3~svn296998-1_multi.changes

2016-03-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
kfreebsd-10_10.3~svn296998-1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: kfreebsd-10_10.3~svn296998-1.dsc kfreebsd-10_10.3~svn296998.orig.tar.xz kfreebsd-10_10.3~svn296998-1.debian.tar.xz kfreebsd-source-10.3_10.3~svn296998-1_all.deb Greetings,

Bug#818842: Hurd check affects GNU/kFreeBSD systems

2016-03-20 Thread Jon Boden
Package: console-setup Version: 1.139 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi Hurd check in keyboard-configuration.postinst also affects GNU/kFreeBSD systems. Fix is attached. -- Jon Boden ubuntuBSD -- Unix for human beings http://www.ubuntubsd.org/ -- https://twitter.com/ubuntuBSD diff -Nur debia

Re: Collaboration from ubuntuBSD project

2016-03-20 Thread Jon Boden
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 03:04:57PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > I had a skim through. I'd say in 80% of cases, the package is fine in > Debian and it was *buntu that broke it (such as removing the [linux-any] > tags from Build-Depends, or the "any-" prefixes in Architecture lists). > > Thes

Re: Bug#818799: ntopng: no longer builds on kfreebsd-i386

2016-03-20 Thread Steven Chamberlain
tags 818799 + patch user debian-bsd@lists.debian.org usertags 818799 + kfreebsd thanks Hi, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > There's a FreeBSD version of that function in src/PacketDumperTuntap.cpp, > however that's guarded by #ifdef __FreeBSD__. That should probably be changed > to > #if defined(_

Bug#818777: kfreebsd-10: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.9)

2016-03-20 Thread Steven Chamberlain
tags 818777 + pending thanks Fix pending in SVN r5955, which will go into experimental first and then sid within a few weeks. Not really an issue anyway since Clang is used instead of GCC on the arches that really exist at the moment. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org signatur

Processed: Re: Bug#818777: kfreebsd-10: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.9)

2016-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 818777 + pending Bug #818777 [kfreebsd-10] kfreebsd-10: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.9) Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 818777: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-

Bug#818771: marked as done (freebsd-glue: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.9))

2016-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2016 16:16:26 + with message-id <20160320161626.ga18...@pyro.eu.org> and subject line Re: Bug#818771: freebsd-glue: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.9) has caused the Debian Bug report #818771, regarding freebsd-glue: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build

Re: Bug#817757: motion: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64: #error This header is not available for amd64

2016-03-20 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, Ximin Luo wrote: > Hey Steven, thanks for the patch. Just to confirm, it's not going to > interfere with the i386 build is it? I guess the current successful > kfreebsd-i386 build must have been against older libraries, and would > fail now against the current libraries, if I don't apply this

Bug#818771: freebsd-glue: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.9)

2016-03-20 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: freebsd-glue Version: 0.2.20 Severity: important Tags: sid stretch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: non-standard-compiler, gcc-4.9, gcc-4.9-legacy This package builds with a non standard compiler version; please check if this package can be built with the default version of gcc

Bug#818777: kfreebsd-10: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.9)

2016-03-20 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: kfreebsd-10 Version: 10.1~svn274115-10 Severity: important Tags: sid stretch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: non-standard-compiler, gcc-4.9, gcc-4.9-legacy This package builds with a non standard compiler version; please check if this package can be built with the default vers

Re: Collaboration from ubuntuBSD project

2016-03-20 Thread Andrew McGlashan
Hi, On 20/03/2016 8:49 PM, Adam Wilson wrote: > Does Ubuntu even use systemd? I think they use runit or something. > Something start*... it escapes me. Due to Ubuntu being heavily based on Debian, they chose to change to systemd going forward; I'm not sure if that has changed or not, but the stre

Re: Collaboration from ubuntuBSD project

2016-03-20 Thread Andrew McGlashan
Hi, On 21/03/2016 1:03 AM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Andrew McGlashan wrote: >> The other part of the problem is that Debian/KfreeBSD is no longer an >> officially supported version of Debian; unofficially it has support, but >> not officially. > > Debian's release team isn't responsible for je

Re: Collaboration from ubuntuBSD project

2016-03-20 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Jon Boden wrote: > Yes, definitely. I was planning to review the patches one by one, > then for each change send a bug report to all the affected parties > (some cases include Debian, some don't) with complete explanation of > the changes, their rationale, etc. > > However there are 77 of them so

Re: Collaboration from ubuntuBSD project

2016-03-20 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Andrew McGlashan wrote: > The other part of the problem is that Debian/KfreeBSD is no longer an > officially supported version of Debian; unofficially it has support, but > not officially. Debian's release team isn't responsible for jessie-kfreebsd, but we seem to have all the other support we nee

Bug#818743: kfreebsd-10: Increase ARG_MAX to match the one from Linux

2016-03-20 Thread Steven Chamberlain
forwarded 818743 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208154 tags 818743 + moreinfo severity 818743 wishlist thanks Hi, Jon Boden wrote: > ARG_MAX is too small for building LibreOffice (errors out with > "Argument list too long"). [...] > I suggest increasing it to match with the Lin

Processed: Re: Bug#818743: kfreebsd-10: Increase ARG_MAX to match the one from Linux

2016-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 818743 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208154 Bug #818743 [kfreebsd-10] kfreebsd-10: Increase ARG_MAX to match the one from Linux Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2081

Bug#818748: support kfreebsd & hurd arches for Ubuntu targets

2016-03-20 Thread Jon Boden
Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.79 With this patch debootstrap supports kfreebsd & hurd arches on Ubuntu targets. -- Jon Boden ubuntuBSD -- Unix for human beings http://www.ubuntubsd.org/ -- https://twitter.com/ubuntuBSD --- debootstrap-1.0.79/scripts/gutsy 2016-02-18 05:01:23.0 +010

Bug#818743: kfreebsd-10: Increase ARG_MAX to match the one from Linux

2016-03-20 Thread Jon Boden
Package: kfreebsd-10 Version: 10.3~svn296373-2 ARG_MAX is too small for building LibreOffice (errors out with "Argument list too long"). This was found when attempting to build LibreOffice on ubuntuBSD. I suggest increasing it to match with the Linux value: $ getconf ARG_MAX 2097152 See also

Bug#818627: src:git: FTBFS on kfreebsd

2016-03-20 Thread Christoph Egger
Package: src:git Severity: important Version: 1:2.8.0~rc3-1 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertag: kfreebsd Hi! git fails the testsuite on kfreebsd currently. This seems to be reproducible with sid chroots on my stable/ufs system but not on my noteboo

Re: Collaboration from ubuntuBSD project

2016-03-20 Thread Adam Wilson
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:44:23 +1100 Andrew McGlashan wrote: > Hi, > > On 20/03/2016 7:35 PM, Adam Wilson wrote: > > Wouldn't it have better to focus on developing Debian GNU/kFreeBSD, > > which could do with the extra attention/work? > > > > Just curious. What was the rationale? > > The other

Re: Collaboration from ubuntuBSD project

2016-03-20 Thread Andrew McGlashan
Hi, On 20/03/2016 7:35 PM, Adam Wilson wrote: > Wouldn't it have better to focus on developing Debian GNU/kFreeBSD, > which could do with the extra attention/work? > > Just curious. What was the rationale? The other part of the problem is that Debian/KfreeBSD is no longer an officially supported

Re: Is Debian GNU/kFreeBSD an entirely free distribution?

2016-03-20 Thread Adam Wilson
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 21:37:12 + pdb wrote: > Unfortunately we live in a world where profit is more important than > Freedom. So to have an operating system 100% Free Software is very > difficult. There are many patents on hardware, and the hardware is a > trusted hardware. Few distributions o

Re: Is Debian GNU/kFreeBSD an entirely free distribution?

2016-03-20 Thread Adam Wilson
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:58:48 +0100 Carsten Leonhardt wrote: > Adam Wilson writes: > > > The FreeBSD kernel as released by the FreeBSD Project contains > > binary blobs. Is the Debian kFreeBSD kernel blob-free, as the > > Debian Linux kernel is? > > Yes, see: > > https://wiki.debian.org/Debi

Re: Collaboration from ubuntuBSD project

2016-03-20 Thread Adam Wilson
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:16:35 +0100 Jon Boden wrote: > Hi everyone, > > ubuntuBSD just went live today with its first release, v15.04 BETA1 > (codenamed "Escape from SystemD"). I'm curious as to why you decided to develop an Ubuntu fork of Debian GNU/kFreeBSD. Was it for the Ubuntu brand name? U