Re: Replacement for setxattr on kFreeBSD?

2016-03-03 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Nikolaus Rath (2016-03-03): > It is pretty hard if you're not a DD (and my request for access to a > guest account is still pending). I blame my trusting db.debian.org over id/nm.debian.org, sorry about that. > Thanks for testing! No worries. KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signatu

Re: Replacement for setxattr on kFreeBSD?

2016-03-03 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On Mar 04 2016, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Nikolaus Rath (2016-03-03): >> On Mar 02 2016, Steven Chamberlain wrote: >> >> [...] Can you tell me how to detect >> >> GNU/kFreeBSD from Python? sys.platform and os.uname are potential >> >> candidates, but the Python docs unfortunately don't mention wh

Re: Replacement for setxattr on kFreeBSD?

2016-03-03 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Nikolaus Rath (2016-03-03): > On Mar 02 2016, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > >> [...] Can you tell me how to detect > >> GNU/kFreeBSD from Python? sys.platform and os.uname are potential > >> candidates, but the Python docs unfortunately don't mention what the > >> values of those variables are for

Re: Replacement for setxattr on kFreeBSD?

2016-03-03 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On Mar 02 2016, Steven Chamberlain wrote: >> [...] Can you tell me how to detect >> GNU/kFreeBSD from Python? sys.platform and os.uname are potential >> candidates, but the Python docs unfortunately don't mention what the >> values of those variables are for GNU/kFreeBSD (and if they differ from >

Bug#816623: kfreebsd-kernel-headers: amd64 and i386 not co-installable

2016-03-03 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Package: src:kfreebsd-kernel-headers Version: 10.1~8 Severity: important User: helm...@debian.org Usertags: rebootstrap Hi, kfreebsd-kernel-headers:kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-kernel-headers:kfreebsd-i386 are not co-installable. | Investigating (0) kfreebsd-kernel-headers [ kfreebsd-amd64 ] < 10