-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 21:28:50 +0200
Source: partman-zfs
Binary: partman-zfs
Architecture: source kfreebsd-i386
Version: 40
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Christian Perrier
Des
Package: zam-plugins
Version: 3.5~repack0-4
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org, 765...@bugs.debian.org
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hello,
The problem building zam-plugins on kfreebsd (and perhaps hurd) seems to
be very easily fixed, with the atta
Package: ftp.debian.org
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Dear FTP master,
Please remove src:kfreebsd-9 from unstable.
kfreebsd-10 is in sid/jessie and that is the only kernel we plan to
support (#750364). I don't think there are any remaining reverse-deps.
Thanks,
Regards,
Hi,
On 16/10/14 15:17, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Shall we go ahead or wait for RC3 (due tomorrow if I read correctly?)
Oh wow, it's all migrating today? I thought we had one more day to wait.
Yes I would like to wait for RC3, since that should be tagged tomorrow
in upstream SVN, and for most pac
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> That stops the problematic freebsd-buildutils from migrating until we've
> fixed freebsd-libs to cope with the change. And within jessie,
> freebsd-libs will not FTBFS. We'll fix it in sid in about 4 days.
Shall we go ahead or wait for RC3 (due tomorrow if I re
Hi!
Lars Lansink writes:
>* What led up to the situation?
>A regular apt-get upgrade
>* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
> ineffective)?
>sudo apt-get upgrade --yes
>* What was the outcome of this action?
>pf version 10.1~svn272167-1 was inst
Package: pf
Version: 10.1~svn272167-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
A regular apt-get upgrade
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffecti
7 matches
Mail list logo