Accepted partman-zfs 40 (source kfreebsd-i386) into unstable

2014-10-16 Thread Christian Perrier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 21:28:50 +0200 Source: partman-zfs Binary: partman-zfs Architecture: source kfreebsd-i386 Version: 40 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Christian Perrier Des

Bug#765617: zam-plugins: building on non-Linux ports

2014-10-16 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Package: zam-plugins Version: 3.5~repack0-4 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org, 765...@bugs.debian.org User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hello, The problem building zam-plugins on kfreebsd (and perhaps hurd) seems to be very easily fixed, with the atta

Bug#765606: RM: kfreebsd-9 -- NVIU; replaced by kfreebsd-10

2014-10-16 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Package: ftp.debian.org User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Dear FTP master, Please remove src:kfreebsd-9 from unstable. kfreebsd-10 is in sid/jessie and that is the only kernel we plan to support (#750364). I don't think there are any remaining reverse-deps. Thanks, Regards,

Bug#764956: freebsd-libs: FTBFS - MK_TESTS can't be set by a user

2014-10-16 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, On 16/10/14 15:17, Christoph Egger wrote: > Shall we go ahead or wait for RC3 (due tomorrow if I read correctly?) Oh wow, it's all migrating today? I thought we had one more day to wait. Yes I would like to wait for RC3, since that should be tagged tomorrow in upstream SVN, and for most pac

Bug#764956: freebsd-libs: FTBFS - MK_TESTS can't be set by a user

2014-10-16 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > That stops the problematic freebsd-buildutils from migrating until we've > fixed freebsd-libs to cope with the change. And within jessie, > freebsd-libs will not FTBFS. We'll fix it in sid in about 4 days. Shall we go ahead or wait for RC3 (due tomorrow if I re

Bug#765588: pfctl does not work after upgrade

2014-10-16 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Lars Lansink writes: >* What led up to the situation? >A regular apt-get upgrade >* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or > ineffective)? >sudo apt-get upgrade --yes >* What was the outcome of this action? >pf version 10.1~svn272167-1 was inst

Bug#765588: pfctl does not work after upgrade

2014-10-16 Thread Lars Lansink
Package: pf Version: 10.1~svn272167-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? A regular apt-get upgrade * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffecti