Bug#763574: xjadeo: FTBFS[kfreebsd,hurd]: unknown target OS

2014-09-30 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Package: xjadeo Version: 0.8.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hi, xjadeo FTBFS on kfreebsd and hurd with a new error during configure: configure: WARNING: *** unknown target OS *** This is easily fixed with the attached patch. Thanks! -- Sy

Bug#763572: pbs-drmaa: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: uses non-POSIX mode flag

2014-09-30 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Package: pbs-drmaa Version: 1.0.17-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hi, pbs-drmaa/job.c uses S_ISREG, which is not part of core POSIX specification; instead it should use the S_IFREG macro. This caused the FTBFS on kfreebsd. Patch is attached

Bug#763570: iozone3: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: wrong make target

2014-09-30 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Package: iozone3 Version: 429-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hi, Please find an updated kfreebsd.diff attached to fix this FTBFS. https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=iozone3&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=429-2&stamp=1412025882 It refresh

Re: kFreeBSD future

2014-09-30 Thread brunomaximom
Em 2014-09-30 17:35, Steven Chamberlain escreveu: On 30/09/14 20:03, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote: I see http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTgwMTE and I am concerned with kFreeBSD too. Ah, I wondered when they would pick up the story! You should probably read the releas

Re: kFreeBSD future

2014-09-30 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 22:48, Christoph Egger wrote: > vlc also seems to randomly die Try moving this file out of the way - seems to work for me: /usr/lib/vlc/plugins/misc/libxdg_screensaver_plugin.so It always seems to happen 30-40 seconds in. ktrace showed the screensaver inhibitor running around that time. If x

Re: kFreeBSD port in Jessie

2014-09-30 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 25/09/14 22:10, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > The results of the final architecture qualification will soon be published. > In there is reference to a number of concerns about the kFreeBSD port and > its place in Jessie. Thanks for this heads-up; I'd seen the release team's mail to d-d-a. We'll

Re: kFreeBSD future

2014-09-30 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi! On 30/09/14 21:54, Christoph Egger wrote: > Steven, do you have a bigger-picture on current things that would be > good to have fixed? Probably dozens of small nits that might cause something to not work right out-of-the box. I probably overlook such things all the time because to me they ar

Re: kFreeBSD future

2014-09-30 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 30/09/14 21:48, Christoph Egger wrote: > There's some thing with mesa complaining about my graphics card not > supported before linux 3.4 [0] but then IIRC it broke in between two kfreebsd 10.1 snapshots? You may want to build the latest package from SVN which is much more recent (BETA 3). Oth

Re: kFreeBSD future

2014-09-30 Thread Christoph Egger
Ahoi! Steven, do you have a bigger-picture on current things that would be good to have fixed? Seems the release team announcments got us some manpower for a while with several people asking where to help Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp

Re: kFreeBSD future

2014-09-30 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > For example, I ran it exclusively this past week on my desktop instead > of GNU/Linux as usual, and was able to still do my usual day-to-day > work. Although only need a modern web browser, the XFCE terminal, an > email client (I managed fine with Mutt) and an XM

Re: kFreeBSD future

2014-09-30 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 30/09/14 20:03, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote: > I see http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTgwMTE and I > am concerned with kFreeBSD too. Ah, I wondered when they would pick up the story! You should probably read the release team mails and log of the IRC meeting. I think

Re: Bug#763502: RM: arb [kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386] -- ROM; Please remove kfreebsd ports since they are not featuring all needed Build-Depends

2014-09-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Steven, On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 05:16:44PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Hi, > > On 16:15, Andreas Tille wrote: > > since the kfreebsd ports are not featuring all Build-Depends of the new > > version of arb these ports should be deleted. > > Since the version currently in sid builds ok o

kFreeBSD future

2014-09-30 Thread brunomaximom
Hi, I see http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTgwMTE and I am concerned with kFreeBSD too. Then I thought: why not make an OS like Illumian was...but with FreeBSD? ie, why not make a FreeBSD with Debian technologies? FreeBSD with APT+DPKG+Aptitude packages instead pkgng? -- T

Re: Bug#763502: RM: arb [kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386] -- ROM; Please remove kfreebsd ports since they are not featuring all needed Build-Depends

2014-09-30 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, On 16:15, Andreas Tille wrote: > since the kfreebsd ports are not featuring all Build-Depends of the new > version of arb these ports should be deleted. Since the version currently in sid builds ok on kfreebsd, if ftpmaster removed it I think it may just got built again. Maybe you need to up

Re: Bug#761277: gdc uninstallable on kfreebsd because of missing dep. libphobos-4.9-dev

2014-09-30 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 07:34:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 12.09.2014 um 15:13 schrieb Thibaut Paumard: > > While it's your prerogative to decrease the severity, please note that > > this bug means that all the packages that build-depend on gdc (22 > > packages in jessie) are currently in

Re: kFreeBSD port in Jessie

2014-09-30 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 25.09.2014 um 23:10 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire: > Hi, > > The results of the final architecture qualification will soon be published. > In there is reference to a number of concerns about the kFreeBSD port and > its place in Jessie. > > We want to recognise that you have put in a lot of work r

Re: Bug#756916: vice: FTBFS[kfreebsd-amd64,powerpc]: error while opening "src/arch/win32/res.rc.po.c" for reading: No such file or directory

2014-09-30 Thread Spiro Trikaliotis
Hello Laszlo, try the attached patch as workaround until upstream manages to correctly handle the dependencies. With that patch, po/ is compiled before anything else. It does not look good, but it should fix the problem. Regards Spiro Regards, Spiro. -- Spiro R. Trikaliotis http://www.trikali