Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> usertags 739867 + kfreebsd
User is debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: kfreebsd.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
739867: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
On 11/09/14 16:00, Andreas Cord-Landwehr wrote:
> Just set up a fresh VM with KFreeBSD-amd64 and using the previously suggested
> patch [1] worked for me to fix the build, see log [2].
> PS: My setup slightly more verbose:
> * KFreeBSD installed from current Debian/SID to VirtualBox
> * got qtweb
Steven Chamberlain (2014-09-12):
> Actually, a complex chain of events needs to occur before that happens,
> some of it will be out of our control (waiting for a bugfix in a build
> dependency), so this likely can't happen for a couple of days. Then it
> should have urgency=low to give at least 1
On 12/09/14 18:52, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Steven Chamberlain (2014-09-10):
>> We'd be ready for kfreebsd 10.1 to go into unstable, [...]
Actually, a complex chain of events needs to occur before that happens,
some of it will be out of our control (waiting for a bugfix in a build
dependency), so
Am 12.09.2014 um 15:13 schrieb Thibaut Paumard:
While it's your prerogative to decrease the severity, please note that
this bug means that all the packages that build-depend on gdc (22
packages in jessie) are currently in an FTBFS-state on kfreebsd.
sure, and they still will ftbfs without libph
Le 12/09/2014 19:34, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> Am 12.09.2014 um 15:13 schrieb Thibaut Paumard:
>> While it's your prerogative to decrease the severity, please note that
>> this bug means that all the packages that build-depend on gdc (22
>> packages in jessie) are currently in an FTBFS-state on kf
[ Dropping -cd@, not a topic for them. ]
Steven Chamberlain (2014-09-10):
> Sounds good; it feels like a good time for a new release. (Perhaps
> biased; I'm keen for the kfreebsd d-i Beta 1 images to go away so
> that people are only testing new ones. that work.)
Thanks for confirming.
> We'
Am 12.09.2014 um 15:13 schrieb Thibaut Paumard:
> While it's your prerogative to decrease the severity, please note that
> this bug means that all the packages that build-depend on gdc (22
> packages in jessie) are currently in an FTBFS-state on kfreebsd.
sure, and they still will ftbfs without li
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 10/09/14 22:10, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi Emilio,
>
> On 10/09/14 20:16, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> [...] what
>> packages are involved, what packages need rebuilds, and of those, which ones
>> currently fail.
>
> The root of this is kfreebsd-source-10.0,
Le 12/09/2014 14:23, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> Control: severity -1 important
Dear Matthias,
While it's your prerogative to decrease the severity, please note that
this bug means that all the packages that build-depend on gdc (22
packages in jessie) are currently in an FTBFS-state on kfreebsd.
Control: severity -1 important
Am 12.09.2014 um 12:47 schrieb Thibaut Paumard:
> Package: gdc
> Version: 4.9.1-4
> Severity: grave
>
> Hi,
>
> gdc currently depends on libphobos-4.9-dev, including on kfreebsd-*, but
> libphobos-4.9-dev is not beeing built on these architectures.
>
> It may be t
11 matches
Mail list logo
