Re: please remove kfreebsd-any from Architecture

2014-06-07 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Robert Millan (2014-06-07): > On 02/06/14 20:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > May I ask what was broken on gdm3 and gnome-shell to have caused all > > these removals? > > Long-standing RC bugs in GDM3 [1], and your choice of making gnome-shell > depend on it. > > Combined with Release Teams

uninstallable on non-Linux

2014-06-07 Thread Robert Millan
Package: gnome-core Severity: serious On 02/06/14 19:56, Steven Chamberlain wrote: And I wonder if we could adjust gnome-core's dependency from: gnome-session (>= 3.4), to: gnome-session (>= 3.4) [linux-any], gnome-session-bin (>= 3.4) [!linux-any], That would imply that gnome-core still achi

Re: please remove kfreebsd-any from Architecture

2014-06-07 Thread Robert Millan
On 02/06/14 19:56, Steven Chamberlain wrote: We'll need to make gnome-session Architecture: linux-any and remove it. Note that it's currently Architecture: all, so I'm not sure this is necessary. AFAIK it's generally accepted to use Architecture: all for kernel-specific or cpu-specific packages

Re: please remove kfreebsd-any from Architecture

2014-06-07 Thread Robert Millan
On 02/06/14 20:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: May I ask what was broken on gdm3 and gnome-shell to have caused all these removals? Long-standing RC bugs in GDM3 [1], and your choice of making gnome-shell depend on it. Combined with Release Teams ruling that including GDM3 in Debian GNU/kFre

Re: gnome-terminal: FTBFS on kfreebsd & hurd archs

2014-06-07 Thread Robert Millan
On 02/06/14 14:13, Andreas Henriksson wrote: You'd find that the default configuration is unusable under non-GNOME (and thus now for all hurd and kfreebsd users). We can't ship unusable software in Jessie. As per -release mandate kfreebsd-* is no exception anymore. It's already been stablished

Re: kfreebsd-9: multiple issues

2014-06-07 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, On 05/06/14 21:52, Nico Golde wrote: > In the process of releasing. Thanks for your work! Thanks for that Nico, however I don't see the advisory listed here for some reason? https://www.debian.org/security/2014/ Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org signature.asc Description:

Processed: block 750805 with 750836

2014-06-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 750805 with 750836 Bug #750805 [libpcap] libpcap: Makes Wireshark FTBFS on kfreebsd-any 750805 was not blocked by any bugs. 750805 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 750805: 750836 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#750836: machine/atomic.h broken, missing __compiler_membar macro

2014-06-07 Thread Romain Francoise
Package: kfreebsd-kernel-headers Version: 10.0~5 Severity: serious libpcap is broken on kfreebsd since kfreebsd-kernel-headers was updated to the FreeBSD 10 headers, which apparently include this change: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=241374 The sys/cdefs.h file shipped i