Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> usertags 749786 + kfreebsd
User is debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: kfreebsd.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
749786: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
Hi Christoph,
If there is at least 10 GiB free disk space on kfreebsd-i386 buildds,
please could src:mongodb be given back for another build attempt?
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
On 31/05/14 18:40, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
IMVHO -release@ doesn't need to know about what happens to every single
package. Feel free to keep that kind of Q & A between maintainers and
porters.
I was under the impression that -release was overseeing the QA requirements
for Jessie are being satis
On 31/05/14 18:22, Pino Toscano wrote:
Attached a first version of patch for it; the changes to control.in
and rules should be fine, while most probably the .install files
could need few tricks (since gnome-terminal-search-provider.ini is
not installed). GNOME team: if you could help on this, tha
Robert Millan (2014-05-31):
> I find it very strange that a terminal application needs gnome-shell. There
> are
> dozens of terminal applications, and so far they seem to manage without
> dragging
> their own desktop environment of choice with them.
>
> Which makes me wonder: Does gnome-termina
tag 749888 + patch
thanks
Hi,
On 2014-05-31 15:43, Robert Millan wrote:
Which makes me wonder: Does gnome-terminal actually work without
gnome-shell?
It seems (just looking at the sources, I'm not a GNOME guy)
gnome-shell is needed to integrate gnome-terminal as search provider
for gnome-shel
Please accept my apologies. Apparently my previous mail wasn't clear enough for
everyone. So please allow me to ellaborate: The text had a statement and some
questions. One can tell them appart because questions end with a '?' sign, and
statements don't. The questions are what I'd really like to
On 31/05/14 17:51, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
Maybe you should try to spend 2 seconds on trying to figure it out
(ie. by searching the package changelog) before posting in the future.
Why?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
Hello Robert Millan!
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 03:43:18PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I find it very strange that a terminal application needs gnome-shell.
[...]
Maybe you should try to spend 2 seconds on trying to figure it out
(ie. by searching the package changelog) before posting
On 15:43, Robert Millan wrote:
> I find it very strange that a terminal application needs gnome-shell.
Stranger still that it is a *build* dependency; here's what happens
without it:
> checking whether to build the gnome-shell search provider... yes
> checking for
> /usr/share/dbus-1/interfaces
On 15:16, Robert Millan wrote:
> Indeed. Unless something has changed, only broken (linux-)i386 dependencies
> prevent migration.
Um, a binary package on any release arch stalls migration, I think. Did
you say that based on the Britney excuses output as shown on the PTS?
Britney tests installabi
Hi,
I find it very strange that a terminal application needs gnome-shell. There are
dozens of terminal applications, and so far they seem to manage without dragging
their own desktop environment of choice with them.
Which makes me wonder: Does gnome-terminal actually work without gnome-shell? I
On 31/05/14 00:42, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 30/05/14 17:57, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Hi Emilio,
On 16:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Just a reminder: there are still various things depending on the removed
packages, preventing things from migrating to testing.
Do you agree it's j
On 30/05/14 18:32, Jérôme Vouillon wrote:
Hi,
On 30/05/2014 17:57, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 16:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Just a reminder: there are still various things depending on the removed
packages, preventing things from migrating to testing.
Do you agree it's just the two
14 matches
Mail list logo
