kfreebsd-11_11.0~svn265310-1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2014-05-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 12:04:51 +0200 Source: kfreebsd-11 Binary: kfreebsd-source-11.0 kfreebsd-headers-11.0-0 kfreebsd-image-11.0-0-amd64 kfreebsd-image-11-amd64 kfreebsd-headers-11.0-0-amd64 kfreebsd-headers-11-amd64 kerne

Processing of kfreebsd-11_11.0~svn265310-1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes

2014-05-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters
kfreebsd-11_11.0~svn265310-1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kfreebsd-source-11.0_11.0~svn265310-1_all.deb kfreebsd-headers-11.0-0_11.0~svn265310-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb kfreebsd-image-11.0-0-amd64_11.0~svn265310-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb kfreebsd-im

Bug#746954: marked as done (CVE-2014-3000: TCP reassembly vulnerability)

2014-05-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 04 May 2014 23:34:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#746954: fixed in kfreebsd-11 11.0~svn265310-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #746954, regarding CVE-2014-3000: TCP reassembly vulnerability to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

freebsd-buildutils_10.0-4_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2014-05-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 14:15:29 +0200 Source: freebsd-buildutils Binary: freebsd-buildutils freebsd-mk Architecture: source kfreebsd-amd64 all Version: 10.0-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: GNU/kFreeBSD Maintai

Processing of freebsd-buildutils_10.0-4_kfreebsd-amd64.changes

2014-05-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters
freebsd-buildutils_10.0-4_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: freebsd-buildutils_10.0-4_kfreebsd-amd64.deb freebsd-mk_10.0-4_all.deb freebsd-buildutils_10.0-4.dsc freebsd-buildutils_10.0-4.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daem

Re: Problems with X11 on Ultra10

2014-05-04 Thread Sad Clouds
On Sun, 4 May 2014 13:38:15 -0400 "David Gosselin" wrote: > Hi, > I was curious as to what prompted you to try "SBUS:/SUNW,ffb@1e,0" > for the BusID value? > Thanks, > Dave > Searched on google for debian on sparc64 and creator3d framebuffer and someone had their xorg.conf with that bus id. Xo

Re: Problems with X11 on Ultra10, BusID value

2014-05-04 Thread Geert Stappers
Op 2014-05-04 om 13:38 schreef David Gosselin: > From: Sad Clouds > Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2014 3:57 AM > > On Sun, 4 May 2014 08:25:16 +0100 Sad Clouds wrote: > > >On Sat, 03 May 2014 17:20:33 -0600 Hayden Kroepfl wrote: > > >> On 03/05/14 03:39 PM, Sad Clouds wrote: > > >> > Hello, I'm new to Debi

Re: Problems with X11 on Ultra10

2014-05-04 Thread David Gosselin
Hi, I was curious as to what prompted you to try "SBUS:/SUNW,ffb@1e,0" for the BusID value? Thanks, Dave -Original Message- From: Sad Clouds Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2014 3:57 AM To: Hayden Kroepfl Cc: debian-po...@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Problems with X11 on Ultra10 On Sun, 4 May

Processed: user debian-secur...@lists.debian.org, merging 746951 746953, usertagging 746949, usertagging 746951 ...

2014-05-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user debian-secur...@lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-secur...@lists.debian.org (was car...@debian.org). > # same source package src:kfreebsd-9 > merge 746951 746953 Bug #746951 [kfreebsd-9] CVE-2014-3000: TCP reassembly vulnerability Bug #

kfreebsd-10_10.0-5_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2014-05-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 12:00:30 +0200 Source: kfreebsd-10 Binary: kfreebsd-source-10.0 kfreebsd-headers-10.0-1 kfreebsd-image-10.0-1-amd64 kfreebsd-image-10-amd64 kfreebsd-headers-10.0-1-amd64 kfreebsd-headers-10-amd64 kerne

Bug#746949: marked as done (CVE-2014-3000: TCP reassembly vulnerability)

2014-05-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 04 May 2014 12:52:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#746949: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #746949, regarding CVE-2014-3000: TCP reassembly vulnerability to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Processing of kfreebsd-10_10.0-5_kfreebsd-amd64.changes

2014-05-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters
kfreebsd-10_10.0-5_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kfreebsd-source-10.0_10.0-5_all.deb kfreebsd-headers-10.0-1_10.0-5_kfreebsd-amd64.deb kfreebsd-image-10.0-1-amd64_10.0-5_kfreebsd-amd64.deb kfreebsd-image-10-amd64_10.0-5_kfreebsd-amd64.deb

please remove kfreebsd-any from Architecture

2014-05-04 Thread Robert Millan
Please could you remove "kfreebsd-any" from Architecture in gnome-shell ? You may close the following RC bugs when doing this: #733122 #735023 A patch is attached for your convenience. Thanks! -- Robert Millan diff -ur gnome-shell-3.8.4.old/debian/control gnome-shell-3.8.4/debian/control

please remove kfreebsd-any from Architecture

2014-05-04 Thread Robert Millan
Please could you remove "kfreebsd-any" from Architecture in gdm3 ? You may close the following RC bugs when doing this: #602724 #601106 #612157 #733546 A patch is attached for your convenience. Thanks! -- Robert Millan diff -ur gdm3-3.8.4.old/debian/control gdm3-3.8.4/debian/control --- gdm3

Re: removing kfreebsd-9 from D-I (Re: Bug#743292: dhclient fails during installation with weekly iso (freebsd-amd64))

2014-05-04 Thread Robert Millan
On 04/05/14 12:54, Cyril Brulebois wrote: If noone can provide a better solution, I'd like to remove kfreebsd-9 from the D-I builds. Feel free to do so. Just try to make sure the boot menus are properly updated. ;) It'd need a small fix. Can you check it in? I don't have write perms in debia

Re: removing kfreebsd-9 from D-I (Re: Bug#743292: dhclient fails during installation with weekly iso (freebsd-amd64))

2014-05-04 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Robert Millan (2014-05-04): > On 26/04/14 21:50, Robert Millan wrote: > >On 22/04/14 15:00, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > >>It was planned to someday remove kfreebsd-9 from d-i, but we still need > >>to think what happens during upgrades. Maybe freebsd-net-tools needs to > >>set a Breaks: on older

Re: gnutls28 transition

2014-05-04 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le dimanche, 4 mai 2014, 02.14:17 peter green a écrit : > Personally I'd add a (build-)depends on the relicensed gmp in the next > gnutls28 upload. That way packages can (build-)depend on the new > gnutls and be assured of getting a GPLv2 compatible version. For cups, as it doesn't build-depend on

Processed: Re: Bug#746949: CVE-2014-3000: TCP reassembly vulnerability

2014-05-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 746949 -1 -2 -3 -4 Bug #746949 [kfreebsd-10] CVE-2014-3000: TCP reassembly vulnerability Bug 746949 cloned as bugs 746951-746954 > # On 04/05/14 11:46, Robert Millan wrote: > # > Affects 10.0, 9.2 and 8.3 > reassign -1 kfreebsd-9 9.2 Bug #74

Re: Bug#746949: CVE-2014-3000: TCP reassembly vulnerability

2014-05-04 Thread Robert Millan
clone 746949 -1 -2 -3 -4 # On 04/05/14 11:46, Robert Millan wrote: # > Affects 10.0, 9.2 and 8.3 reassign -1 kfreebsd-9 9.2 reassign -2 kfreebsd-8 8.3 #> Possibly 9.0 and HEAD as well (haven't checked yet). # Yes, it does. However 9.0 wasn't included in the advisory because it is not # support

Bug#746949: CVE-2014-3000: TCP reassembly vulnerability

2014-05-04 Thread Robert Millan
Package: kfreebsd-10 Version: 10.0-4 Severity: grave Tags: security fixed-upstream http://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-14:08.tcp.asc Affects 10.0, 9.2 and 8.3 Possibly 9.0 and HEAD as well (haven't checked yet). -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ..

removing kfreebsd-9 from D-I (Re: Bug#743292: dhclient fails during installation with weekly iso (freebsd-amd64))

2014-05-04 Thread Robert Millan
On 26/04/14 21:50, Robert Millan wrote: On 22/04/14 15:00, Steven Chamberlain wrote: It was planned to someday remove kfreebsd-9 from d-i, but we still need to think what happens during upgrades. Maybe freebsd-net-tools needs to set a Breaks: on older kernels? We already have this. See: Brea

Re: Problems with X11 on Ultra10

2014-05-04 Thread Sad Clouds
On Sun, 4 May 2014 08:25:16 +0100 Sad Clouds wrote: > On Sat, 03 May 2014 17:20:33 -0600 > Hayden Kroepfl wrote: > > > On 03/05/14 03:39 PM, Sad Clouds wrote: > > > Hello, I'm new to Debian and trying it out on Ultra10 which has > > > Creator3D framebuffer. > > > > > > I installed Debian stab

Re: Problems with X11 on Ultra10

2014-05-04 Thread Sad Clouds
On Sat, 03 May 2014 17:20:33 -0600 Hayden Kroepfl wrote: > On 03/05/14 03:39 PM, Sad Clouds wrote: > > Hello, I'm new to Debian and trying it out on Ultra10 which has > > Creator3D framebuffer. > > > > I installed Debian stable and seem to be having some issues with > > X11 or display manager.