package: kfreebsd-9
severity: serious
version: 9.2-2
Hi,
The kfreebsd-amd64 buildds seem to reboot when building gcc-4.[6789]. I was
able to reproduce this issue in a sid pbuilder chroot on a fresh jessie
install. With kfreebsd-9, I get a crash (screenshot in attach). I also tried
with kfreebsd-1
On 30/03/14 20:28, Tim Retout wrote:
> Right, but this does not comply with the Java policy, which requires
> default-jdk as the build dependency
Thanks for pointing this out. I hadn't seen the rest of the thread on
debian-java@. The versioned dependency and the removal of kfreebsd-*
and sparc b
On 30/03/14 19:53, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Maybe glpk-java should have a more specific build-dependency on
> openjdk-7-jdk instead of default-jdk. Then it builds fine.
This is apparently not allowed by Debian Java Policy, according to
https://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2014/03/msg00129.html
On 30 Mar 2014 20:16, "Steven Chamberlain" wrote:
>
> Control: tags 742405 + patch
>
> On 28/03/14 20:30, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > This doesn't seem right to me. "zookeeper ftbfs without openjdk" sounds
> > like a build dependency should be more specific - instead of depending
> > on default
Control: tags 742405 + patch
On 28/03/14 20:30, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> This doesn't seem right to me. "zookeeper ftbfs without openjdk" sounds
> like a build dependency should be more specific - instead of depending
> on default-jdk (which may or may not be suitable).
Yes, it builds fine if
Package: glpk-java
Version: 1.0.32-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
glpk-java FTBFS on kfreebsd-* because those arches currently have
gcj-jdk as their default-jdk
Maybe glpk-java should have a more specific build-dependency on
openjdk-7-jdk instead of
Package: xmail
Version: 1.27-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Followup-For: Bug #626718
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
I don't see why this bug was downgraded. The kfreebsd binaries are
out-of-date in sid and this prevents testing migration.
The fix is really simple;
Hi,
gcc-4.8/4.8.2-16 seems to have fixed the ICE seen when compiling package
flann; both buildds have the new gcc-4.8 version, so please could flann
be given back on kfreebsd-amd64?
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists
Package: xbattbar
Version: 1.4.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
xbattbar FTBFS on kfreebsd, but the attached simple change fixes this.
Thanks.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, '
FYI: The status of the partman-zfs source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 32
Current version: 33
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later
Package: ninja-build
Version: 1.3.4-1.1
Tags: patch
Followup-For: Bug #717364
Hi,
The attached patch seems to fix building on kfreebsd 9 (and later)
very easily.
Thanks.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: kfreeb
Hi,
I could not reproduce the libzorpll testsuite failures when I tried just
now. Please could it be given back for rebuild on kfreebsd-i386 and
kfreebsd-amd64?
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
Hi,
I could not reproduce the libzorpll testsuite failures when I tried just
now. Please could it be given back for rebuild on kfreebsd-i386 and
kfreebsd-amd64?
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
Hi,
Package mmtk seems to be able to build with current sid. Please could
it be given back for rebuild on kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64?
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Package: mutextrace
Version: 0.1.4-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
This package FTBFS because a test fails on kfreebsd and hurd, but
built successfully in the past:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mutextrace&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=0.1.
Package: buzztard
Version: 0.6.0-1.1
Severity: serious
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
buzztard currently does not build on kfreebsd-* because the gudev
dependency in debian/control should be linux-any:
| libgudev-1.0-dev [linux-any]
After that, there is a problem which
Package: gst-buzztard
Version: 0.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
gst-buzztard currently FTBFS on kfreebsd due to:
| /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -I. -I..
-DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"gst-buzztard-check\" -pthread -I/usr/includ
Hi,
Because gcc-4.6 and gcc-4.7 were building when the buildds became
unreachable, those packages are stuck in 'building' state (but other
things have been building on those buildds since then).
So, please could you give back those packages on kfreebsd-amd64?
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberl
18 matches
Mail list logo