freebsd-utils_10.0-3_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2014-02-17 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:47:54 +0100 Source: freebsd-utils Binary: freebsd-utils freebsd-utils-udeb kldutils kldutils-udeb kbdcontrol kbdcontrol-udeb vidcontrol freebsd-net-tools freebsd-net-tools-udeb freebsd-nfs-server fre

Re: Init system for non-Linux ports

2014-02-17 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 02:47:14PM +, Robert Millan wrote: > On 14/02/2014 18:46, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > > Well, we have an announcement today from Canonical - AIUI Upstart will > > be discontinued after Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and they will switch to systemd: > > http://www.markshuttleworth

Processing of freebsd-utils_10.0-3_kfreebsd-amd64.changes

2014-02-17 Thread Debian FTP Masters
freebsd-utils_10.0-3_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: freebsd-utils_10.0-3.dsc freebsd-utils_10.0-3.debian.tar.gz freebsd-utils_10.0-3_kfreebsd-amd64.deb freebsd-utils-udeb_10.0-3_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb kldutils_10.0-3_kfreebsd-amd64.deb kldut

Re: Emulation of sendfile().

2014-02-17 Thread Robert Millan
On 17/02/2014 09:12, Eric Wong wrote: > Robert Millan wrote: >> If you can write a Linux-compatible sendfile() which uses BSD-ish >> SYS_sendfile >> as backend, I guess they'll have no problem exporting a new symbol in glibc? >> After all, it's glibc who claims to provide it (via ). > > I emulat

provides sendfile() prototype (in ) but no sendfile symbol

2014-02-17 Thread Robert Millan
Package: libc0.1-dev Severity: normal Perhaps we could use emulated Linux-like sendfile() from Eric Wong. See: On 17/02/2014 09:12, Eric Wong wrote: > Robert Millan wrote: >> If you can write a Linux-compatible sendfile() which uses BSD-ish >> SYS_sendfile >> as backend, I guess they'll have no

Re: Emulation of sendfile().

2014-02-17 Thread Eric Wong
Robert Millan wrote: > If you can write a Linux-compatible sendfile() which uses BSD-ish SYS_sendfile > as backend, I guess they'll have no problem exporting a new symbol in glibc? > After all, it's glibc who claims to provide it (via ). I emulate Linux sendfile on (non-Debian) FreeBSD that way i