Bug#738942: properly implement kfreebsd inet6 auto

2014-02-13 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Package: ifupdown Version: 0.7.47.2 Tags: ipv6 patch User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hi, Please consider this patch to the implementation of the 'inet6 auto' stanza for kfreebsd. In the current one (which I wrote) I erroneously tried to enable accept_rtadv via the sysctl, wh

Can you sent me a copy of list please ,if at all possible can you include free bsd dwnload

2014-02-13 Thread dqnguyen01
Sent from my iPad -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/7ca4df78-adba-4315-ac74-2231c2f51...@gmail.com

Re: Bug#736765: USB mouse attach event not processed

2014-02-13 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 14/02/14 01:53, Robert Millan wrote: >> FreeBSD 10.0 and PC-BSD have had issues for some using a USB mice in X >> at all, at least according to: >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTYwMzQ > > Are you sure the person who wrote this is using devd? I don't know which. Potentia

Re: Bug#736765: USB mouse attach event not processed

2014-02-13 Thread Robert Millan
Btw here's my latest patch in case you want to try. On 14/02/2014 01:53, Robert Millan wrote: > On 14/02/2014 01:37, Steven Chamberlain wrote: >> On 13/02/14 16:06, Robert Millan wrote: >>> It is based on a patch from FreeBSD, with some fixes of mine. Their plan is >>> to have >>> it merged in X

Re: Bug#736765: USB mouse attach event not processed

2014-02-13 Thread Robert Millan
On 14/02/2014 01:37, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 13/02/14 16:06, Robert Millan wrote: >> It is based on a patch from FreeBSD, with some fixes of mine. Their plan is >> to have >> it merged in X upstream in the near future (I've already submitted my fixes >> to them >> and I expect they will be

Re: Bug#736765: USB mouse attach event not processed

2014-02-13 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 13/02/14 16:06, Robert Millan wrote: > It is based on a patch from FreeBSD, with some fixes of mine. Their plan is > to have > it merged in X upstream in the near future (I've already submitted my fixes > to them > and I expect they will be included as well). FreeBSD 10.0 and PC-BSD have had

Bug#738188: VESA Newcons is awfully slow

2014-02-13 Thread Robert Millan
On 12/02/2014 18:36, Ed Maste wrote: > On 12 February 2014 09:05, Robert Millan wrote: >> There's a small glitch during VT switch: immediately after pressing the >> keys, screen is redrawn, but where you'd normally see the login prompt, >> blurry characers are drawn. After a fraction of a second,

Re: Bits from the Release Team: Architecture health check

2014-02-13 Thread brunomaximom
Secondly, there are cases like GDM, where a single unsupported package have rather "long reaching" consequences. In the concrete example, GNOME (via gnome-core) strictly depends on gdm3, meaning that if gdm3 goes, (more or less) all of gnome goes with it[2]. That in turn means that task-gnome-de

Re: Bits from the Release Team: Architecture health check

2014-02-13 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 12/02/14 20:06, Niels Thykier wrote: > kFreeBSD is just shy of 90%, whereas most other release architectures > are at 96%[1]. Here kFreeBSD has increased in the past quarter from > ~89.5% to "almost, but not quite 90%". I'm a little puzzled you mention this as a problem because... > Here we n

Re: Bits from the Release Team: Architecture health check

2014-02-13 Thread Robert Millan
On 12/02/2014 20:06, Niels Thykier wrote: > As I see it, there are two concrete problems with the (number of) > supported packages. First, the number of packages actually built on > kFreeBSD is just shy of 90%, whereas most other release architectures > are at 96%[1]. Here kFreeBSD has increased i

isc-dhcp-client: missing Depends on freebsd-net-tools

2014-02-13 Thread Robert Millan
Package: isc-dhcp-client Version: 4.2.4-7 Severity: grave Tags: patch User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd isc-dhcp-client requires ifconfig and route tools in order to bring up the network on GNU/kFreeBSD, however it doesn't depend on the package providing them (freebsd-net-tools)

Re: Bug#736765: USB mouse attach event not processed

2014-02-13 Thread Robert Millan
On 13/02/2014 20:24, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 16:06:49 +, Robert Millan wrote: > >> ++#if XORG_VERSION_CURRENT < 1080 > > These don't belong here. We know what version we're building. > > Also in general I'd prefer to wait until the patch is at least sent to > xor

Re: Bug#736765: USB mouse attach event not processed

2014-02-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 16:06:49 +, Robert Millan wrote: > ++#if XORG_VERSION_CURRENT < 1080 These don't belong here. We know what version we're building. Also in general I'd prefer to wait until the patch is at least sent to xorg-devel before taking it. Cheers, Julien signature.asc

Re: WITH_NEW_XORG?

2014-02-13 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 13/02/14 15:55, Robert Millan wrote: > You can get 3D with either kfreebsd-10 or kfreebsd-11 if you manually load > drm2 and then i915kms. IIRC most changes in the WITH_NEW_XORG patchset are applied already in sid/jessie. Hopefully you can test it like this: # kldload drm2 && kldload i915kms (

Re: Bug#736765: USB mouse attach event not processed

2014-02-13 Thread Robert Millan
Control: tags -1 patch On 26/01/2014 17:14, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 17:22:30 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > >> Package: xserver-xorg-core >> Version: 2:1.14.5-1 >> Severity: important >> User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org >> Usertags: kfreebsd >> >> I started X, and the mous

Re: WITH_NEW_XORG?

2014-02-13 Thread Robert Millan
On 13/02/2014 15:47, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote: > so only kfreebsd-11 could give me 3D acceleration or just for a while?? You can get 3D with either kfreebsd-10 or kfreebsd-11 if you manually load drm2 and then i915kms. However, on kfreebsd-10 this will cause the screen to go black. The

Re: WITH_NEW_XORG?

2014-02-13 Thread brunomaximom
Em 2014-02-13 13:39, Robert Millan escreveu: On 13/02/2014 15:35, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote: Hi, is there a WITH_NEW_XORG patch in X? I have installed PC-BSD 10.0 here and my intel 3D graphics is working fine (i have intel and ati). I'd like to use it on kFreeBSD too. That patch is F

xserver-xorg-video-nv_2.1.20-2+b1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2014-02-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:00:59 +0100 Source: xserver-xorg-video-nv (1:2.1.20-2) Binary: xserver-xorg-video-nv Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 Version: 1:2.1.20-2+b1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: GNU/kFreeBSD

xserver-xorg-video-nv_2.1.20-2+b1_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2014-02-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:00:59 +0100 Source: xserver-xorg-video-nv (1:2.1.20-2) Binary: xserver-xorg-video-nv Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 Version: 1:2.1.20-2+b1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: GNU/kFreeBSD M

Re: WITH_NEW_XORG?

2014-02-13 Thread Robert Millan
On 13/02/2014 15:35, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote: > Hi, is there a WITH_NEW_XORG patch in X? I have installed PC-BSD 10.0 here > and my intel 3D graphics is working fine (i have intel and ati). I'd like to > use it on kFreeBSD too. That patch is FreeBSD-specific but it is being worked on.

WITH_NEW_XORG?

2014-02-13 Thread brunomaximom
Hi, is there a WITH_NEW_XORG patch in X? I have installed PC-BSD 10.0 here and my intel 3D graphics is working fine (i have intel and ati). I'd like to use it on kFreeBSD too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list

Processing of xserver-xorg-video-nv_2.1.20-2+b1_kfreebsd-i386.changes

2014-02-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
xserver-xorg-video-nv_2.1.20-2+b1_kfreebsd-i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xserver-xorg-video-nv_2.1.20-2+b1_kfreebsd-i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...

Re: Heads up: xorg-server 1.15 soon in sid

2014-02-13 Thread Robert Millan
On 13/02/2014 14:52, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 13/02/14 14:37, Julien Cristau wrote: >> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 13:51:36 +, Robert Millan wrote: >>> >> How can we fix this? >>> >> >> > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#non-free-buildd > "Check whether it i

Processing of xserver-xorg-video-nv_2.1.20-2+b1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes

2014-02-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
xserver-xorg-video-nv_2.1.20-2+b1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xserver-xorg-video-nv_2.1.20-2+b1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ.

Re: Heads up: xorg-server 1.15 soon in sid

2014-02-13 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 13/02/14 14:37, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 13:51:36 +, Robert Millan wrote: >> How can we fix this? >> > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#non-free-buildd "Check whether it is legally allowed and technically possible to auto-build the pac

Re: Heads up: xorg-server 1.15 soon in sid

2014-02-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 13:51:36 +, Robert Millan wrote: > On 13/02/2014 07:36, Julien Cristau wrote: > > It doesn't seem to be whitelisted in wanna-build, so I'm unable to > > binNMU it. > > How can we fix this? > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#non-free-bu

Re: Heads up: xorg-server 1.15 soon in sid

2014-02-13 Thread Robert Millan
On 13/02/2014 07:36, Julien Cristau wrote: > It doesn't seem to be whitelisted in wanna-build, so I'm unable to > binNMU it. How can we fix this? > Would you mind building and uploading binNMUs yourself? Sure, no problem. Building as I type. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi

Bug#738188: VESA Newcons is awfully slow

2014-02-13 Thread Markus Koschany
On 12.02.2014 14:59, Robert Millan wrote: > On 09/02/2014 12:56, Markus Koschany wrote: >> Switching between virtual terminals and X works flawlessly after I >> loaded the intel drivers manually. > > What about switching from one VT to another? (no X involved) Works perfectly. signature.asc D