Hi,
LightDM is really the best option for a DM to kFreeBSD considering the
Canonical CLA? Why not KDM or even XDM?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/4ab
n the GRUB2-based images
built by d-i (which are used only for kfreebsd and hurd) on systems
where it was working before. Feel free to downgrade if this severity is
wrong.
Example of d-i image with a broken grub2pxe file:
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-i386/20140203-00:49/netb
tags 695500 + moreinfo
block 695500 by 711799
user debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
usertags 695500 kfreebsd
thanks
Going from GRUB 2.00-18 to 2.00-22, I don't see "error: variable
`prefix' isn't set" any more. It would be nice to know if the problem
is still reproducible, although this is blocked by
On 04/02/14 00:34, Robert Millan wrote:
> Where are all these being downloaded to? The root ramdisk is constrained, but
> tmpfs isn't. We can mount that anywhere we'd like.
I'm guessing /var/cache/anna in the ramdisk initially, but udpkg
installs their contents one at a time all over the root file
Package: ufsutils-udeb
Version: 9.2-3
Severity: grave
Tags: jessie sid d-i
Affects: debian-installer
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
X-Debbugs-Cc: k...@debian.org
Image:
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/20140203-00:50/netboot-9/mini.iso
Can reproduce this by
sized) ramdisk:
>
> Image:
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-i386/20140203-00:49/netboot-9/mini.iso
>
>> Feb 4 00:06:08 anna[287]: DEBUG: retrieving apt-mirror-setup 1:0.85
...
Where are all these being downloaded to? The root ramdisk is constrained, but
tmpfs isn
exactly which image I use.
I've found a more severe problem affecting kfreebsd-i386 d-i images
though - udebs seem to have grown in number/size since wheezy, as they
now fill the (fixed-sized) ramdisk:
Image:
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-i386/20140203-00:49/netboot-9/mini.iso
>
On 03/02/2014 23:13, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 03/02/14 22:53, Robert Millan wrote:
>> Does anyone want to test this further before I upload it to sid?
>
> I would like to test but not sure how soon I can do this; some things
> on my list to check would be:
>
> * mkfs.ufs (which seemed brok
Steven Chamberlain (2014-02-03):
> * mkfs.ufs (which seemed broken yesterday in jessie d-i images with
> 9.2 kernel?)
Which image(s)?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 03/02/14 22:53, Robert Millan wrote:
> Does anyone want to test this further before I upload it to sid?
I would like to test but not sure how soon I can do this; some things
on my list to check would be:
* mkfs.ufs (which seemed broken yesterday in jessie d-i images with 9.2
kernel?)
* DHCP
*
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 23:25:03 +0100
Source: freebsd-utils
Binary: freebsd-utils freebsd-utils-udeb kldutils kldutils-udeb kbdcontrol
kbdcontrol-udeb vidcontrol freebsd-net-tools freebsd-net-tools-udeb
freebsd-nfs-server fre
freebsd-utils_10.0-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
freebsd-utils_10.0-2.dsc
freebsd-utils_10.0-2.debian.tar.gz
freebsd-utils_10.0-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
freebsd-utils-udeb_10.0-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb
kldutils_10.0-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
kldut
I think FreeBSD 10 userland (freebsd-utils and freebsd-libs) might be ready for
uploading to unstable.
After today's freebsd-net-tools 10.0-2 upload, it no longer breaks network
access
in your system, which is a big improvement ;-)
Does anyone want to test this further before I upload it to sid
Your message dated Mon, 03 Feb 2014 22:48:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#736202: fixed in freebsd-utils 10.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #736202,
regarding undeterministic output when running egrep repeatedly with the same
input
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Mon, 03 Feb 2014 22:48:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#736238: fixed in freebsd-utils 10.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #736238,
regarding ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): Invalid argument
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
(Putting -boot in the loop again.)
Steven Chamberlain (2014-02-03):
> On 03/02/14 22:24, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Are you thinking about origin/zol?
>
> Ah, yes it's already staged there.
>
> You reverted one commit from that series already, one that enabled
> builds for linux-any and also lo
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 22:51:51 +0100
Source: kfreebsd-kernel-headers
Binary: kfreebsd-kernel-headers
Architecture: source kfreebsd-amd64
Version: 10.0~4
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: GNU/kFreeBSD Maintain
On 03/02/14 22:24, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Steven Chamberlain (2014-02-03):
>> I feel tempted to revert much of it if kfreebsd is the only user of the
>> package now. I could maybe move those bits to a branch out of the way?
>
> Are you thinking about origin/zol?
Ah, yes it's already staged th
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 22:48:35 +0100
Source: kfreebsd-kernel-headers
Binary: kfreebsd-kernel-headers
Architecture: source kfreebsd-amd64
Version: 9.2~8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainer
Steven Chamberlain (2014-02-03):
> On 03/02/14 21:49, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > Please remove partman-zfs from linux-any. It's only built on
> > kfreebsd-any again since version 29.
>
> A whole lot of changes got applied for the benefit on ZFS-on-Linux, so I
> thought. It was sort of accidenta
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.0~4_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.0~4.dsc
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.0~4.tar.gz
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.0~4_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on
On 03/02/14 21:49, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Please remove partman-zfs from linux-any. It's only built on
> kfreebsd-any again since version 29.
A whole lot of changes got applied for the benefit on ZFS-on-Linux, so I
thought. It was sort of accidentally applied in master without a
review, the ch
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_9.2~8_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_9.2~8.dsc
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_9.2~8.tar.gz
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_9.2~8_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
On 01/02/2014 19:42, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Control: forcemerge 708697 736608
>
> Ah, I filed a duplicate bug for this by mistake, and already submitted a
> patch: http://bugs.debian.org/736608
My bad...
A. Maitland, please use Steven's patch, it is more complete than mine.
--
Robert Mil
Your message dated Mon, 03 Feb 2014 14:02:56 +
with message-id <52efa190.7010...@debian.org>
and subject line fixed in experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #737460,
regarding freebsd-glue: BD-Uninstallable: b-d on missing
kfreebsd-kernel-headers (>= 10.0~3)
to be marked as done.
This
25 matches
Mail list logo
