Hi Helge!
On 01/12/2014 10:36 PM, Helge Deller wrote:
>> Indeed. Congratulations on that! I'm glad to see the HPPA port coming
>> back to life. I'd love to test it myself, but the only PA-RISC machine
>> that I currently know of which is in my vicinity is located inside a
>> laboratory at my physi
On 12/01/2014 19:17, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 12.01.2014 00:16, schrieb Robert Millan:
Have you tried locking your screen?
>> No. And I just rechecked, but I couldn't find any button to do that. Please
>> can you provide more details on what I should try?
>>
>> Mind that I'm completely unfami
On 12/01/2014 17:55, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 12.01.2014 17:47, schrieb Michael Biebl:
>> In summary, the patch is not quite ready yet imho.
>
> Hm, looking more closely, instead of moving the files around, it might
> be better to use a try {} catch {} statement like we do for NM.
>
> Robert, ca
Hi Adrian,
On 01/12/2014 05:32 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:37:52PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
>> as you might have noticed, we did huge progress on the HPPA (PA-RISC) port:
>> http://buildd.debian-ports.org/stats/
>
> Indeed. Congratulations on that! I'm glad
On 20:05, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> I think this is the interesting part:
Something interesting happened before that, too. I was trying to
update the 'gzip' package:
2014-01-12 19:57:56 status unpacked gzip:kfreebsd-amd64 1.6-3
2014-01-12 19:57:57 status half-configured gzip:kfreebsd-amd64 1.6
Control: tags -1 found apt/0.9.14.2
Indeed upgrading only libapt-pkg4.12 is enough to trigger this.
On 00:07, Robert Millan wrote:
> Does "ktrace -d" yield anything interesting? Or maybe one of dpkg's
> debug flags? (see dpkg --debug=help)
I think this is the interesting part:
6058 apt-get C
Control: fixed -1 apt/0.9.12.1
I haven't updated from dpkg/1.16.12 and apt/0.9.12.1, and I
haven't experienced this issue yet.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: kfre
On 17:11, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Selecting previously unselected package kfreebsd-image-11.0-0-amd64.
> (Reading database ... 152993 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to unpack
> .../kfreebsd-image-11.0-0-amd64_11.0~svn260450-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
> ...
> Unpacki
Hi,
On 16:27, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> look: http://media.libreplanetbr.org/u/dharc/m/dpkg-bug-kfreebsd-amd64/
Please could you run this from a terminal so that you can copy+paste the
error messages (in English) into an email as text?
$ LANG=C sudo apt-get upgrade
p.s. you may also
Hi guys,
look: http://media.libreplanetbr.org/u/dharc/m/dpkg-bug-kfreebsd-amd64/
any package I install, I get errors like that.
I don't know if it's occuring on GNU/Linux Jessie because I have Linux
Wheezy here and kFreeBSD Jessie.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.or
Package: empathy
Version: 3.4.2.3-2+deb7u1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I'm reporting this bug from Linux.
Empathy can't open window conversation in kfreebsd-amd64 testing. Look this
video:
http://media.libreplanetbr.org/u/dharc/m/embathy-bug-kfreebsd-am
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.8.0~rc4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
I'm reporting this bug from Linux, the problem is: eclipse-cdt and eclipse-jdt
are installed but Eclipse can't create C/C++ or Java projects.
I installed too the Pydev and same problem, look the video
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> gcc-4.9 is uploaded to experimental, asking the porters to watch for build
> failures and corresponding patches. See
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gcc-4.9&suite=experimental
>
> These are already fixed in the vcs.
>
> -
Hello Helge!
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:37:52PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> as you might have noticed, we did huge progress on the HPPA (PA-RISC) port:
> http://buildd.debian-ports.org/stats/
Indeed. Congratulations on that! I'm glad to see the HPPA port coming
back to life. I'd love to test it
On 12/01/2014 13:52, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Robert Millan wrote (12 Jan 2014 12:35:56 GMT) :
>> For example, I've been trying to assess the state of GNOME in
>> general by trying to find bugs myself. I will report my findings
>> soon, however this is clearly not optimal. My quick "kick the tir
Hi,
Robert Millan wrote (12 Jan 2014 12:35:56 GMT) :
> For example, I've been trying to assess the state of GNOME in
> general by trying to find bugs myself. I will report my findings
> soon, however this is clearly not optimal. My quick "kick the tires"
> testing is much less reliable than day-to
On 12/01/2014 09:24, Niels Thykier wrote:
> It was filed as serious and then downgraded by Julien on July 9th.
> Indeed, buildd.d.o lists no build problems at all. So at first glance I
> would expect the tests to have been disabled/ignored. Assuming this is
> no a simple "error-hiding" tactics, t
Hi Bob,
On 12/01/2014 04:41, Bob Bib wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
> starting from the 9.2-1 release,
> this package is built only for 'kfreebsd-any':
>> debian/changelog
>> ...
>> Switch architecture to kfreebsd-any.
>
> Meanwhile, some utils ('mkfs.ufs', 'fsck.ufs' etc.)
> can also be useful on ot
On 2014-01-12 00:01, Robert Millan wrote:
> On 11/01/2014 22:54, Robert Millan wrote:
>>> Do you have an idea of the consequences of making it linux-only? If it
>>> is just using (e.g.) xdm instead of and kFreeBSD losing a couple of
>>> packages, it will probably not be much of an issue. But then
On 2014-01-11 23:10, Robert Millan wrote:
> On 11/01/2014 21:32, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> As for #712848, the latest comment sent by Petr suggested that the test
>>> might be
>>> incorrect when applied to kqueue.
>>>
>>
>> I guess you are referring to comment #25 here? Quote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Se
Am 16.12.2013 11:34, schrieb Matthias Klose:
> Package: java-common
> Version: 0.50
> Severity: serious
> Tags: jessie, sid
>
> openjdk-7 currently ftbfs on sparc, sparc64, s390, kfreebsd-any. So please
> either remove the default-* packages on these archs, or fall back to gcj.
>
> - the hotspot
21 matches
Mail list logo
