On Sun, 15 Dec 2013, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Backporting the fix to these kernels might be a good idea, probably best
> > routed through an stable update upload (and not a security upload).
>
> This might be a bit complicated due to significant changes in internal
> APIs. I'm also unsure if the y
Your message dated Sun, 15 Dec 2013 23:47:16 +0100
with message-id <52ae3174.10...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#731144: kfreebsd: drm2 and i915kms kernel modules are
not loaded automatically
has caused the Debian Bug report #731144,
regarding libdrm: obsolete patch for drmCheckModesettingS
On 14/12/2013 02:08, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>> kfreebsd 8.3 and 9.0 (wheezy):
>> Sets Via chipset to serve /dev/random unconditionally whenever detected,
>> but only on i386 (not amd64). Does not support Intel entropy source.
>> (see sys/dev/random/probe.c)
>
> Backporti
Forwarding to the other lists from original thread...
Original Message
Subject: Re: Fwd: possible /dev/random compromise (misplaced trust in RDRAND /
Padlock entropy sources)
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:53:19 +0100
From: Yves-Alexis Perez
To: Robert Millan
CC: t...@security.deb
On 15/12/2013 00:52, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Do you think running 9.2 kernels on stable will be feasible? I fear it
> needs some freebsd-{libs,utils} from 9.2 as well? (especially pfctl ..)
You'll have to try to know for sure, but it's probably not as bad as
last major kernel versi
On 15/12/2013 05:16, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Hi guys
> Look for the IDLE and Eclipse on kFreeBSD...
> IDLE almost freezes when I try to open a file, the edit window can't be
> closed and the name of the file isn't on top of window.
> Eclipse...well, I have eclipse-cdt installed and I
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> If it's actually improving performance then it's likely some kind of
> data / code alignment / caching interplay. It'd be a good project to
> hunt that down and figure out what's going on.
>From the data presented it *not* improving performan
Hi Thorsten,
thanks for your help!
On 12/15/2013 02:59 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Helge Deller dixit:
>
>> We noticed, that when we manually binmnu-upload packages, which are
>> already in the *same version* on debian-ports, then debian-ports ACCEPT
>
> When you binNMU packages you add a +b1,
If it's actually improving performance then it's likely some kind of
data / code alignment / caching interplay. It'd be a good project to
hunt that down and figure out what's going on.
-a
On 8 December 2013 11:02, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Eitan Adler wro
Hello Aurelien,
On 12/15/2013 09:03 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:54:43AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
>> On 12/15/2013 06:32 AM, Dave Land wrote:
>>> Not sure what's up at debian-ports.org, but I've been trying to
>>> debootstrap 2 different HPPA machines for the last coup
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:54:43AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> On 12/15/2013 06:32 AM, Dave Land wrote:
> > Not sure what's up at debian-ports.org, but I've been trying to
> > debootstrap 2 different HPPA machines for the last couple days and
> > have been getting a variety of errors (size
On 15/12/13 04:22, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Yeah, that's unnecessary.
> The program is ported now. What do you wnat? The patch or the package?
Did you patch some existing packaging to produce this? In that case a
debdiff may be ideal.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.o
On 15/12/13 12:34, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Uhm I think we both may have misunderstood. Perhaps 'this state'
>> just means 'as technology preview'. I.e. normal QA requirements are
>> no longer waived because of preview status.
>
> This is exactly what we meant; we intend to not do technology previe
On 12/15/13 3:54 AM, Helge Deller wrote:
On 12/15/2013 06:32 AM, Dave Land wrote:
Not sure what's up at debian-ports.org, but I've been trying to
debootstrap 2 different HPPA machines for the last couple days and
have been getting a variety of errors (size mismatches, files not
found when they w
Gnome guys is not interested in help kFreeBSD because now Gnome is
Linux-only.
FreeBSD guys is porting Gnome 3.6 yet and Debian has 3.10 incoming.
I think is more feasible to bet on a Gnome-derivative DE like MATE
and/or Cinnamon because they are portable and they are interested in
being portab
Helge Deller dixit:
>We noticed, that when we manually binmnu-upload packages, which are
>already in the *same version* on debian-ports, then debian-ports ACCEPT
When you binNMU packages you add a +b1, +b2, … suffix to their
versions. ITYM porter upload?
>those packages, but if we then try to ap
On 2013-11-30 11:46, Robert Millan wrote:
> On 28/11/2013 21:49, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> On 28/11/13 20:04, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> kFreeBSD was a technology preview, and has not generated enough
>>> user interest to bring in sufficient install base to continue
>>> in this state.
>>>
>>> We
Thanks Eitan. Forwarding to -bsd
< said:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Garrett Wollman wrote:
>> In article
>>
>> you write:
>>> The question below has been unanswered since Sat, Sep 14, 2013.
>>>
>>> Are there any known concerns with enabling IPSEC? Is there any reason
>>> to not
On 12/15/2013 06:32 AM, Dave Land wrote:
> Not sure what's up at debian-ports.org, but I've been trying to
> debootstrap 2 different HPPA machines for the last couple days and
> have been getting a variety of errors (size mismatches, files not
> found when they were there 20 minutes before, etc.
19 matches
Mail list logo
