Re: IPSEC

2013-09-25 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 22:59, Robert Millan wrote: > Steven Chamberlain: > > But I wonder if it would become awkward if features are provided by > > flavours. Someday we could end up with e.g. 3x2x2 different flavours, > > or have to offer the choice of one feature but not both together. > > I think offering the cho

Re: IPSEC

2013-09-25 Thread Robert Millan
Steven Chamberlain: > But I wonder if it would become awkward if features are provided by > flavours. Someday we could end up with e.g. 3x2x2 different flavours, > or have to offer the choice of one feature but not both together. I think offering the choice of one feature but not both together is

Re: IPSEC

2013-09-25 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 25/09/13 13:27, Robert Millan wrote: > Since we got no response from upstream, I would prefer if IPSEC support > was archieved by providing a separate kernel flavour. Is that okay with you? Yes that may be the best option currently. But I wonder if it would become awkward if features are provi

Re: IPSEC

2013-09-25 Thread Robert Millan
Since we got no response from upstream, I would prefer if IPSEC support was archieved by providing a separate kernel flavour. Is that okay with you? Robert Millan: > > Hi! > > Is there any particular reason (performance, stability concerns...) > IPSEC support is not enabled in GENERIC? > > In

xserver-xorg-video-nv_2.1.20-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2013-09-25 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:04:06 +0200 Source: xserver-xorg-video-nv Binary: xserver-xorg-video-nv Architecture: source kfreebsd-amd64 Version: 1:2.1.20-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers

Processing of xserver-xorg-video-nv_2.1.20-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes

2013-09-25 Thread Debian FTP Masters
xserver-xorg-video-nv_2.1.20-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xserver-xorg-video-nv_2.1.20-2.dsc xserver-xorg-video-nv_2.1.20-2.diff.gz xserver-xorg-video-nv_2.1.20-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on

Bug#724325: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-nv: FTBFS against xserver 1.14)

2013-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 25 Sep 2013 11:48:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#724325: fixed in xserver-xorg-video-nv 1:2.1.20-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #724325, regarding xserver-xorg-video-nv: FTBFS against xserver 1.14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#724325: xserver-xorg-video-nv: FTBFS against xserver 1.14

2013-09-25 Thread Robert Millan
Petr Salinger: >> your package needs to be rebuilt against xorg-server 1.14. That >> most likely means pulling in a couple changes from upstream git HEAD. > > It suffices to put attached file into debian/patches/ > and enlist it in debian/patches/series. > > Please, could some DD (Robert, please

Re: Deterministic builds

2013-09-25 Thread Robert Millan
Steven Chamberlain: > Hi, > > Something we can also do, which I hadn't thought of until now, is to > compare kernel images built on kfreebsd-amd64 vs. on linux amd64. An > obvious difference is the ELF header: > >> kfreebsd-amd64/boot/kfreebsd-9.2-1-amd64: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, >>