Re: where is eclipse?

2013-09-06 Thread Robert Millan
Steven Chamberlain: >> It fails to build with our default-jdk. On kfreebsd that is currently >> gcj, which seems insufficient to build eclipse. >> >> So, eclipse could maybe change to a more specific build-depends if >> that's appropriate, so that openjdk-7-jdk is used, since we do have it. >> >>

Re: where is eclipse?

2013-09-06 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 06/09/13 23:16, Bruno Maximo e Melo wrote: > I can't understand very well...the transitions is necessary or not? It's simply a change to the java-defaults package. Seems we will be going ahead with this very soon because the benefits seem to outweigh the risks. After that the next build attem

Re: Re: where is eclipse?

2013-09-06 Thread Bruno Maximo e Melo
I can't understand very well...the transitions is necessary or not? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1378505806.5602.1.camel@debian

kfreebsd-kernel-headers_9.2~2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2013-09-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 21:58:15 +0200 Source: kfreebsd-kernel-headers Binary: kfreebsd-kernel-headers Architecture: source kfreebsd-amd64 Version: 9.2~2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers

Re: where is eclipse?

2013-09-06 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 06/09/13 21:55, Robert Millan wrote: > The way I see it, as things stand now it makes a lot more sense to > bypass default-jdk in order to get things working... What do you mean by that? To tighten the build-dependencies of eclipse and others, that can't build with gcj? I think the risk is th

Re: where is eclipse?

2013-09-06 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
On 06/09/2013 23:24, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 06/09/13 21:55, Robert Millan wrote: >> The way I see it, as things stand now it makes a lot more sense to >> bypass default-jdk in order to get things working... > What do you mean by that? To tighten the build-dependencies of eclipse > and othe

Re: Bug#721886: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: glibtop_machine.h:26:19: fatal error: nlist.h: No such file or directory

2013-09-06 Thread Robert Millan
Michael Biebl: > Am 06.09.2013 02:49, schrieb Michael Biebl: >> /usr/include/sys/vnode.h:41:27: fatal error: sys/rangelock.h: No such >> file or directory >> #include > > FWIW, this looks like a bug in sys/vnode.h or kfreebsd-kernel-headers. Thanks. Fixed in 9.2~2. -- Robert Millan -- To U

Re: where is eclipse?

2013-09-06 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 06/09/13 20:38, Robert Millan wrote: > Speaking of which, what's the current status? AFAICT -release said it > doesn't require their explicit approval? Oops, I forgot to copy my reply to the list: On 06/09/13 11:54, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 06/09/13 04:52, Bruno Melo wrote: >> why eclips

Processing of kfreebsd-kernel-headers_9.2~2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes

2013-09-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_9.2~2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kfreebsd-kernel-headers_9.2~2.dsc kfreebsd-kernel-headers_9.2~2.tar.gz kfreebsd-kernel-headers_9.2~2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host

Re: where is eclipse?

2013-09-06 Thread Robert Millan
Bruno Melo: > why eclipse is not in kfreebsd? it's the best ide, i think necessary... We can't build it until after the openjdk-7 transition, I'm afraid. Speaking of which, what's the current status? AFAICT -release said it doesn't require their explicit approval? -- Robert Millan -- To UNSU

Re: Bug#721776: libprelude: FTBFS on kfreebsd (FAIL: test-poll)

2013-09-06 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 03:07:43 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > 2. connection in the past few minutes is in TIME_WAIT state - for some > reason it still fails even though SO_REUSEADDR is requested here (and I > think this is important - needs followup). There seems to be a race > within the t