why eclipse is not in kfreebsd? it's the best ide, i think necessary...
On 05/09/13 18:51, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I couldn't reproduce this on falla (ran make check a few times). Can a
> kfreebsd porter take a look?
It built successfully for me locally in a wheezy chroot and twice in a
sid chroot.
It seems test-poll tries to listen on 127.0.0.1:12345 for TCP
connec
Am 06.09.2013 02:49, schrieb Michael Biebl:
> /usr/include/sys/vnode.h:41:27: fatal error: sys/rangelock.h: No such
> file or directory
> #include
FWIW, this looks like a bug in sys/vnode.h or kfreebsd-kernel-headers.
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
u
tags 721886 + help
thanks
Am 05.09.2013 23:08, schrieb Guillem Jover:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 19:52:13 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Am 05.09.2013 19:42, schrieb Julien Cristau:
>>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 19:40:18 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 05.09.2013 19:29, schrieb Julien Cris
Robert Millan writes:
> Christoph Egger:
>> Christoph Egger writes:
>>> Robert Millan writes:
> clang (3.2-10) fails to build my kfreebsd-10 while gcc-4.6 builds it
> just fine. Is this a known problem somewhere?
Found. See #721880.
If you need a workaround, you can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I am not currently a porter but I would like to be one for the
architecture parisc/hppa.
I currently have lots of parisc hardware (5 workstations and 4 servers),
all currently running debian unstable from our own debian repository
at www.pari
Hi!
On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 19:52:13 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 05.09.2013 19:42, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> > On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 19:40:18 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> Am 05.09.2013 19:29, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> >>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 17:50:18 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
Julien Cristau:
>> That's confusing tbh. Why is libbsd-dev using different paths in the
>> first place which requires such hacks?
>>
> Because the normal bsd paths would conflict with gnu libc-dev headers
> (maybe not for nlist.h, but for others).
nlist.h is provided by libelf-dev and libelfg0-dev
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 19:52:13 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Why do libc-dev and libbsd-dev have conflicting files in the first place
> and why not move just the conflicting (BSD) files to bsd/ ?
>
I don't understand what you mean here, sorry...
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digi
Am 05.09.2013 19:42, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 19:40:18 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> Am 05.09.2013 19:29, schrieb Julien Cristau:
>>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 17:50:18 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 05.09.2013 17:29, schrieb Robert Millan:
> -#include
> +#i
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 19:40:18 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 05.09.2013 19:29, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> > On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 17:50:18 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> Am 05.09.2013 17:29, schrieb Robert Millan:
> >>> -#include
> >>> +#include
> >>
> >> Does that also work with FreeBSD
Am 05.09.2013 19:29, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 17:50:18 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Am 05.09.2013 17:29, schrieb Robert Millan:
>>> -#include
>>> +#include
>>
>> Does that also work with FreeBSD so can be pushed upstream?
>> Apparently libgtop2 has native FreeBSD suppor
Am 05.09.2013 19:53, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 19:52:13 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> Why do libc-dev and libbsd-dev have conflicting files in the first place
>> and why not move just the conflicting (BSD) files to bsd/ ?
>>
> I don't understand what you mean here, sorry
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 02:04:10 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Source: libprelude
> Version: 1.0.0-11
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
> Control: block 712615 with -1
>
> Hi,
>
> libprelude FTBFS on the kfreebsd buildds, see th
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 17:50:18 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 05.09.2013 17:29, schrieb Robert Millan:
> > Michael Biebl:
> >> Source: libgtop2
> >> Version: 2.28.5-1
> >> Severity: serious
> >> User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
> >> Usertags: kfreebsd
> >>
> >> libgtop2 FTBFS [1] with the fol
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the src:imagevis3d package:
#697015: enable build on architectures without posix_fadvise()
It has been closed by Mathieu Malaterre .
Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
If this ex
Am 05.09.2013 17:29, schrieb Robert Millan:
> Michael Biebl:
>> Source: libgtop2
>> Version: 2.28.5-1
>> Severity: serious
>> User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
>> Usertags: kfreebsd
>>
>> libgtop2 FTBFS [1] with the following error:
>>
>> make[4]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/sysdeps/common'
Michael Biebl:
> Source: libgtop2
> Version: 2.28.5-1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: kfreebsd
>
> libgtop2 FTBFS [1] with the following error:
>
> make[4]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/sysdeps/common'
> /bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile
Christoph Egger:
> Christoph Egger writes:
>> Robert Millan writes:
clang (3.2-10) fails to build my kfreebsd-10 while gcc-4.6 builds it
just fine. Is this a known problem somewhere?
>>>
>>> Found. See #721880.
>>>
>>> If you need a workaround, you can add -D__FreeBSD_kernel__ to CFLAGS
Christoph Egger writes:
> Robert Millan writes:
>>> clang (3.2-10) fails to build my kfreebsd-10 while gcc-4.6 builds it
>>> just fine. Is this a known problem somewhere?
>>
>> Found. See #721880.
>>
>> If you need a workaround, you can add -D__FreeBSD_kernel__ to CFLAGS in
>> debian/patches/003_
Robert Millan writes:
>> clang (3.2-10) fails to build my kfreebsd-10 while gcc-4.6 builds it
>> just fine. Is this a known problem somewhere?
>
> Found. See #721880.
>
> If you need a workaround, you can add -D__FreeBSD_kernel__ to CFLAGS in
> debian/patches/003_glibc_dev_aicasm.diff
Seems to no
21 matches
Mail list logo
