Quoting Steven Chamberlain (ste...@pyro.eu.org):
> > the kernel no longer provides
> > UFS modules and there is no point in having a D-I udeb for this
> > filesystem. See #717239.
>
> kFreeBSD does, it's our default filesystem! I don't think we really
> want to remove this package...
OK, hence
On 16/08/13 13:15, Christoph Egger wrote:
> I talked to rene here at DebConf. The problems did show up in the past
> when running the testsuite (hangs). Rene tried with current OpenJDK on
> falla -- in current kfreebsd sid -- and it does now works as well as
> anywhere on !linux-x86 which means we
Moin!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> In particular we need to check libreoffice first. The maintainer
> thought there were reproducible issues trying to build it on kfreebsd-*
> using openjdk-7, on porter boxes; I didn't see a problem when I tried
> it locally though.
I talked to rene here at De
The dependency should be still satisfied on kFreeBSD and Hurd. On
kFreeBSD it's even our default filesystem.
Since the package is arch: all, is this an actionable bug? It seems to
me no different than say, partman-zfs dependencies not being satisfied
on GNU/Linux.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlai
> the kernel no longer provides
> UFS modules and there is no point in having a D-I udeb for this
> filesystem. See #717239.
kFreeBSD does, it's our default filesystem! I don't think we really
want to remove this package...
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
5 matches
Mail list logo