Moin!
Robert Millan writes:
> However, as we're currently in the middle of FreeBSD 9.1 transition,
> this could be a bit disruptive for 9.1 testing.
>
> Some ideas on what could be done:
>
> - Fast-track 9.1 by uploading it immediately to unstable, then upload
> 9.2 (at least kernel) to experimen
2013/7/16 Petr Salinger :
> The value itself does not matter here, but ABS->33 change.
>
> Try to build and run via ktrace under stable and under sid
>
> int main()
> {
> sbrk(16*1024);
> };
>
> You will see the key difference.
Just one thought that came to mind, in case this helps: startup.S in
2013/7/17 Petr Salinger :
> Hi.
>
> Updated version of FBTL (NPTL like) glibc is available from experimental.
Nice!
Btw, I don't have time to do this right now, but it might be a good
idea to try the testsuites for ruby, perl and python (and possibly
others). They tend to break very easily on thr
Hi,
Upstream is about to release the first betas for FreeBSD 9.2. It is
possible we could benefit from packaging the betas (at least for the
kernel) and putting them in experimental, helping us find bugs early
so that upstream can include fixes in their final release.
In this regard, bugs that mi
Hi.
Updated version of FBTL (NPTL like) glibc is available from experimental.
Thanks to Aurelien.
Petr
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/alpi
5 matches
Mail list logo
