Wheezy has both kfreebsd-8 and kfreebsd-9.
Shouldn't kfreebsd-8 be dropped now?
Definitely, release of jessie should not include kfreebsd-8.
Is there some problem with carrying it now in sid and testing ?
It sounds convenient to keep 8.3 in sid for staging security or stable
updates. Keepin
On 16/06/13 23:49, Christoph Egger wrote:
> I guess there's going to be a 9.2 with the missing stuff soon(ish)?
Most likely, but there's no schedule yet. So I would guess later this
year, and then the first kfreebsd-10 RC sometime next year.
> If so the extra features probably aren't worth the t
On 16/06/13 19:57, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Wheezy has both kfreebsd-8 and kfreebsd-9. Shouldn't kfreebsd-8 be dropped
> now?
Some other things I'm wondering about are:
stable updates - would we need to keep kfreebsd-8 at least in sid to be
able to do these? If kfreebsd-8 is removed from test
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> On 16/06/13 19:57, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>> Wheezy has both kfreebsd-8 and kfreebsd-9. Shouldn't kfreebsd-8 be dropped
>> now?
>
> I've been wondering about this too.
>
> Upstream released 8.4 this month. It has some new features not present
> in 9.1, but it
Hi,
On 16/06/13 19:57, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Wheezy has both kfreebsd-8 and kfreebsd-9. Shouldn't kfreebsd-8 be dropped
> now?
I've been wondering about this too.
Upstream released 8.4 this month. It has some new features not present
in 9.1, but it is already being called a 'legacy releas
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, le Sun 16 Jun 2013 19:08:03 +0200, a écrit :
> I have prepared a patch (untested) that I believe would fix or would start
> fixing this. Could you comment on it and/or ACK/NACK it?
It seems fine.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
Hi,
Wheezy has both kfreebsd-8 and kfreebsd-9. Shouldn't kfreebsd-8 be dropped now?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2013061618571
Package: vlc
Version: 2.0.7-1
Severity: grave
Hello kfreebsd maintainers,
VLC 2.0.7 FTBFS with kfreebsd-i386. It used to build fine with VLC 2.0.6.
Below is the relevant excerpt from the build logs:
libtool: link: g++ -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat
-Werror=format-
Hi,
As you can see on [1], webkitgtk failed to build on kfreebsd. That was an old
version, but I believe latest 2.0.x in experimental is also affected. I expect
hurd to be affected as well, after the PATH_MAX bug is fixed (I have
reintroduced the patch from #669059 that was lost in experimental fo
tag 707726 + fixed-upstream
thanks
Hi,
Alle venerdì 10 maggio 2013, Pino Toscano ha scritto:
> Earlier today I fixed it on Hurd, and emailed the author with fixed.
Both the patches I sent him and attached to this bug were included in
the new upstream version 2.3.18, released some days ago.
Tha
Hi!
Petr Salinger writes:
> Please, could it be rescheduled on buildd with really
> lot of RAM and swap space ?
We have fano and fayrfax. Both of which have 3GiB real RAM and 0.5GiB
SWAP. I can probably ask DSA to give me some more swap.
Christoph
--
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22
libtool: link: g++ -fPIC -DPIC -shared -nostdlib
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/4.7/../../../x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/crti.o
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/4.7/crtbeginS.o [*very long list of objects*]
-Wl,--whole-archive ./.libs/libWebCore.a ./.libs/libWebCoreGtk.a
-Wl,--no-whole-archive -W
12 matches
Mail list logo
