2013/5/20 Guido Günther
> > > @porters: can the buildds be updated so we can respin the build?
> > >
> >
> > I've contacted buildd admin of kfreebsd-{amd64,i386} to update buildd
> > machines to wheezy.
>
> Cool. I wonder if we should binNMU in the meantime?
in the meantime, I've pushed prebui
On 20/05/13 17:54, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 20/05/13 07:56, Petr Salinger wrote:
>> - one common repository x repository per package
>> I slightly prefer one common.
> And I think the commit log of Git works globally, [...]
Also I think it would be near impossible to do merges, if multipl
Hi Petr,
On 20/05/13 07:56, Petr Salinger wrote:
> - one common repository x repository per package
> I slightly prefer one common.
What might be the advantage of this?
And could submodules possibly provide the same convenience? (A
repository that points to all the others).
A downside to a
retitle 704227 pu: freebsd-utils/9.0+ds1-11~deb7u1
tags 704227 - unblock + wheezy pu
thanks
Hi,
> "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
>> The version needs to be lower than that in testing, so either -10+deb7u1
>> or -11~deb7u1.
I think we'll go with the latter; that should be more descriptive as it
is a
As buildd admin I can't directly do the upgrade
apart from asking DSA to go ahead this which I'll do as soon as wheezy
buildds are figured out for wheezy infrastructure (which is currently
being worked on).
Please ask them to use kfreebsd-9 kernel,
as only it have (backported):
* fix_VOP_VPTO
Hi!
Guido Günther writes:
> Cool. I wonder if we should binNMU in the meantime?
One could do porter uploads in the meantime. However I guess we'll make
many people (openjdk folks, release folks, ...) unhappy with kfreebsd-*
binaries in the archive and a unbuildable (on the buildds) source --
ev
Hi!
Damien Raude-Morvan writes:
> @porters: can the buildds be updated so we can respin the build?
>
> I've contacted buildd admin of kfreebsd-{amd64,i386} to update buildd
> machines to wheezy.
IIRC it related to squeeze vs wheezy schroot (or was it
sbuild). Anyways wheezy is released now
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 02:20:19PM +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2013/5/20 Guido Günther
>
> > Hi Matthias, hi kFreeBSD porters,
> >
> > On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:38:50PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > Am 18.05.2013 19:36, schrieb Guido Günther:
> > > > Package: openjdk-7
> >
Hi,
2013/5/20 Guido Günther
> Hi Matthias, hi kFreeBSD porters,
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:38:50PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Am 18.05.2013 19:36, schrieb Guido Günther:
> > > Package: openjdk-7
> > > Version: 7u21-2.3.9-4
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > > Tags: patch
> > >
> > > Hi,
> >
Hi Matthias, hi kFreeBSD porters,
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:38:50PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 18.05.2013 19:36, schrieb Guido Günther:
> > Package: openjdk-7
> > Version: 7u21-2.3.9-4
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > Hi,
> > attached patch updates Damien's OpenJDK support f
On 20.05.2013 08:56, Petr Salinger wrote:
> - packaging-only or full content
> I strongly prefer packaging-only.
>
> - one common repository x repository per package
> I slightly prefer one common.
Note that git unlike svn does not really like check-outs of paths only
within a repository. Hen
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> On Sun, 2013-05-12 at 18:50 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> This went into sid with version 9.0+ds1-11 and has migrated to jessie.
>>
>> For a pu upload, would the version number have to be 9.0+ds1-11+deb7u1 ?
>
> The version needs to be lower than that in testing,
The same problems exists in ufsutils/8.2-3. Please find attached a patch
for the aforementioned version that addresses this issue.
Regards,
Nikos
Index: ufsutils-8.2/sbin/growfs/growfs.c
===
--- ufsutils-8.2.orig/sbin/growfs/growfs.
13 matches
Mail list logo
