Re: Current and upcoming toolchain changes for jessie

2013-05-07 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 01:39 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: [...] > - I didn't upload linux-libc-dev myself, but until today I didn't >see any announcement or a test rebuild done by the Debian kernel >maintainers, so I did add the note about what I did see in multiple >packages when doing

Re: Current and upcoming toolchain changes for jessie

2013-05-07 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 06:35:16PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 01:59:38AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > > They weren't coordinated within the team. Furthermore I don't consider > > that eglibc was ready to go to unstable, as it was known that two > > architectures were

Re: Current and upcoming toolchain changes for jessie

2013-05-07 Thread Adam Conrad
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 01:59:38AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > They weren't coordinated within the team. Furthermore I don't consider > that eglibc was ready to go to unstable, as it was known that two > architectures were going to FTBFS, without a real try to get that fixed > (for example by

Re: Current and upcoming toolchain changes for jessie

2013-05-07 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, On 07/05/13 14:25, Matthias Klose wrote: > == (e)glibc 2.17 == > > We had hoped that leaving > it FTBFS in experimental for several months and gently pinging [...] That was a bit unexpected, and I haven't seen it brought up on debian-bsd@ until now. > == GCC 4.8 == > > It is planned to onl

Re: Current and upcoming toolchain changes for jessie

2013-05-07 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 01:39:25AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 07.05.2013 17:48, schrieb Aurelien Jarno: > > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 03:25:29PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> Up to today jessie did see updates for the kernel headers, eglibc, and > >> GCC. > > > > What a wonderful coordina

Re: Current and upcoming toolchain changes for jessie

2013-05-07 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 07.05.2013 17:48, schrieb Aurelien Jarno: > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 03:25:29PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >> Up to today jessie did see updates for the kernel headers, eglibc, and >> GCC. > > What a wonderful coordination with the release team. Quoting the last > mail from them on the mailing

Re: Early boot failures with kFreeBSD >= 10.0~svn248992

2013-05-07 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi all! Steven McDonald writes: >> Which compiler did you build with? Still using gcc-4.6? > > Using gcc-4.6, yes. FWIW I've been seeing this with gcc-4.6 gcc-4.7 and clang -- that's the reason we still don't have a newer kfreebsd-10 upload in the archive. Thank you for starting to dig! This is

Fix regression for kfreebsd-{i386,amd64} builds (#690319/CVE-2013-0288)

2013-05-07 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Steven, hi Arthur On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 11:55:22PM +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote: > On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 23:05 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > > I noticed (by chance) there is a problem with the squeeze-security > > patch for #690319; it introduces a regression on kfreebsd and has not > >

Re: Current and upcoming toolchain changes for jessie

2013-05-07 Thread Adam Conrad
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:48:52PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Even if I have to admit I currently don't have a lot of time, it would > have been nice to keep the other people in the team in the loop about > such an upload. You'd been fairly inactive of late, and I felt I'd take some initiat

Re: Current and upcoming toolchain changes for jessie

2013-05-07 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:03:58AM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote: > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:48:52PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > > Even if I have to admit I currently don't have a lot of time, it would > > have been nice to keep the other people in the team in the loop about > > such an upload

Re: Current and upcoming toolchain changes for jessie

2013-05-07 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 03:25:29PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Up to today jessie did see updates for the kernel headers, eglibc, and > GCC. What a wonderful coordination with the release team. Quoting the last mail from them on the mailing list: | As for Squeeze, we'd ask that you co-ordinate

Re: Early boot failures with kFreeBSD >= 10.0~svn248992

2013-05-07 Thread Steven McDonald
Hi Steven, Thanks for the reply! On Tue, 07 May 2013 13:56:36 +0100 Steven Chamberlain wrote: > So the very last thing shown on-screen would be "Loading kernel of > FreeBSD ...", and is that still visible when the system hangs? I should have been a bit more descriptive here, sorry. GRUB output

Re: Early boot failures with kFreeBSD >= 10.0~svn248992

2013-05-07 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi Steven, On 07/05/13 13:26, Steven McDonald wrote: > When I say "non-booting", there is literally no > output from the kernel at all after GRUB loads it. So the very last thing shown on-screen would be "Loading kernel of FreeBSD ...", and is that still visible when the system hangs? How are yo

Early boot failures with kFreeBSD >= 10.0~svn248992

2013-05-07 Thread Steven McDonald
Hi, I've been attempting to build newer kfreebsd-10 packages derived from the package currently in experimental. I'm able to build working kernel packages with orig tarballs up to and including r248991 with some changes to the patches and an additional one (which I intend to submit to the BTS lat