Re: Gnome installability vs. GNU/kFreeBSD

2013-04-09 Thread Michael Dorrington
On 09/04/13 19:15, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le mardi, 9 avril 2013 19.29:23, Steven Chamberlain a écrit : >> During wheezy development, GNOME 3 was so broken for us that xfce was >> chosen as a default for new installs. Multiple show-stopper issues got >> fixed during the freeze though. At t

Re: Gnome installability vs. GNU/kFreeBSD

2013-04-09 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le mardi, 9 avril 2013 19.29:23, Steven Chamberlain a écrit : > During wheezy development, GNOME 3 was so broken for us that xfce was > chosen as a default for new installs. Multiple show-stopper issues got > fixed during the freeze though. At this point I believe it 'should > work' but so few pe

Re: Gnome installability vs. GNU/kFreeBSD

2013-04-09 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, On 09/04/13 13:45, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > 1. I thought both the addition of iw and network-manager-gnome as > Depends or Recommends in tasksel was depending on that "arch: all" > vs. "arch: any" discussion. As long as they are lowered to Recommends, it shouldn't matter any more if

Gnome installability vs. GNU/kFreeBSD (was: "tasksel arch any" vs. "keeping track of n-m in debian-cd"?)

2013-04-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois (09/04/2013): > Then I think I'd rather ask you to keep doing so for wheezy's > lifetime, than trying to fiddle with tasksel at this very late point > of the freeze. To clarify as I did on IRC: 1. I thought both the addition of iw and network-manager-gnome as Depends or Recom