This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the src:argyll package:
#678909: argyll: FTBFS: *** No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop.
It has been closed by Christian Marillat .
Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
If th
Hi again.
Seems the ouput in the buildlog (only considering the part
dpkg-buildpackage starts to run is identical (after applying
«PKGBUILDDIR» to the sbuild .60 log) apart from timestamps, one mktemp
thing and stub adresses in these little ldd outputs. Untill one fails
and the other does not of
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.
Your message has
Package: src:libncursesada
Version: 5.9.20110404-6
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi!
Your package failed to build on t
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.
As you requested
Package: src:clang
Version: 3.1-6
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi!
Your package failed to build on the kfreebsd-* bui
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.
As you requested
Package: src:sacjava
Version: 1.3-5
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi!
Your package failed to build on the kfreebsd-* b
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.
As you requested
Package: src:bouncycastle
Version: 1.46+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi!
Your package failed to build on the k
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.
As you requested
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 677417 + tcc
Bug #677417 [kfreebsd-kernel-headers] kfreebsd-source-9.0: _types.h breaks tcc
as it uses gcc specific type __va_list
Added indication that 677417 affects tcc
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Hi,
I've been trying to look into the ruby1.9.1 bug and have some beginner
questions about our libc.
Do we define SIGCANCEL as __SIGRTMIN?
If so, having redefined __SIGRTMIN from 32 to the awkward number 65,
does that not cause problems when trying to mask it?
From
http://anonscm.debian.org/v
Hi folks,
as you may know, nobody else stepped up, so I'm volunteering again to
try and get a new debian-installer release out, codenamed « beta 1 ».
I have looked at the packages mentioned on the udeb testing summary
page[1] and I have “urgented” many of them, so that they reach testing
sooner t
Hi,
24 червня 2012 о 22:05 +0200 xavier grave написав(-ла):
> I finally get time to investigate further : it looks like bug #642128.
> But now this is the -Wl,-as-needed option that causes the error message.
> If I compile without this flag, no more missing symbols. I didn't find
> any bug related
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 07/06/2012 22:11, xavier grave a écrit :
> Le 07/06/2012 21:14, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov a écrit :
>> Hi,
>
>> This looks like the first part of bug
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642128
>> It was closed, but maybe re-appeared aga
Hi all!
I'm still experimenting with my stable VM.
sbuild/schroot from stable result in the dl_minimal assertion error
sbuild/schroot from unstable either build fine or end up in the ``could
not find libjava.so'' thing (I'm considering this ``successfull'' for now.
The set of installed packages
Hi!
> Steven Chamberlain writes:
>> I've recently being trying a rebuild of some packages that have not had
>> recent build attempts on kfreebsd-* buildds. So far I was able to
>> successfully build the following packages in a clean, up-to-date sid
>> chroot on kfreebsd-i386 (9.0-1-686 kernel) :
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> I've recently being trying a rebuild of some packages that have not had
> recent build attempts on kfreebsd-* buildds. So far I was able to
> successfully build the following packages in a clean, up-to-date sid
> chroot on kfreebsd-i386 (9.0-1-686 kernel) :
>
> p
19 matches
Mail list logo
