On 13/06/12 23:08, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Please could you update all the kfreebsd-* buildds with gcc-4.7
> 4.7.0-13. That fixes GCC PR c++/53602.
Actually I meant GCC PR c++/26155, which was also fixed in that gcc-4.7
upload. This was problem seen on amd64 buildds too as #676734.
Regards,
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the src:ember package:
#677392: ember: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: cannot change permissions of
`/build/buildd-ember_0.6.2+dfsg-1-kfreebsd-amd64-2EGmEt/ember-0.6.2+dfsg/debian/ember/usr/games/ember':
No such file or directo
Hi Christoph,
Please could you update all the kfreebsd-* buildds with gcc-4.7
4.7.0-13. That fixes GCC PR c++/53602.
Then please could you arrange givebacks for magics++ on kfreebsd-*, and
digicam just on kfreebsd-i386, as I think that was the reason for their
recent build failures, and they see
Source: kfreebsd-9
Version: 9.0-3
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Files _types.h define __builtin_va_list through typedef to be __va_list.
This type is gcc specific and thus may not be accepted by other compilers.
As a matter of fact, tcc stopped being able to compile files on kfreebsd-any
beca
On 13/06/12 21:12, Robert Millan wrote:
> Thanks Steven. I'll upload on friday if noone beats me to it. Btw
> the ipv6refcount fix is probably needed too.
Great, thanks. I'll try to commit the patch for the ipv6refcount errata
notice by then.
I just committed the sysret fix in the kfreebsd-8 t
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 22:22:23 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2012/6/13 Julien Cristau :
> >> On FreeBSD, including also gives you . But
> >> that doesn't apply to GNU systems. This looks like a simple
> >> portability issue.
> >>
> > I'd rather that got fixed in kfreebsd, unless there's a good
2012/6/13 Julien Cristau :
>> On FreeBSD, including also gives you . But
>> that doesn't apply to GNU systems. This looks like a simple
>> portability issue.
>>
> I'd rather that got fixed in kfreebsd, unless there's a good reason to
> differ here.
I'm not sure what you mean here. You want to
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 22:10:08 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2012/6/13 Steven Chamberlain :
> > My other guess would be this, which also works; would appreciate advice
> > from others on debian-bsd@ though:
>
> It's basically up to libdrm-dev maintainers. Do they expect that
> stdint.h is a p
2012/6/13 Steven Chamberlain :
> Please let me know if my commit seems correct and someone please do an
> upload with the appropriate urgency setting when ready.
Thanks Steven. I'll upload on friday if noone beats me to it. Btw
the ipv6refcount fix is probably needed too.
--
Robert Millan
--
2012/6/13 Steven Chamberlain :
> My other guess would be this, which also works; would appreciate advice
> from others on debian-bsd@ though:
It's basically up to libdrm-dev maintainers. Do they expect that
stdint.h is a prerequisite before including drm.h?
On FreeBSD, including also gives you
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.
As you requested
Package: src:smartmontools
Version: 5.42+svn3539-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi!
Your package failed to build on t
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.
As you requested
Package: src:ember
Version: 0.6.2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi!
Your package failed to build on the kfreebs
Hi,
Please let me know if my commit seems correct and someone please do an
upload with the appropriate urgency setting when ready.
On 13/06/12 14:14, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Author: stevenc-guest
> Date: 2012-06-13 13:14:00 + (Wed, 13 Jun 2012)
> New Revision: 4301
>
> Added:
>trunk/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 677299 + fixed-upstream
Bug #677299 [kfreebsd-10] kfreebsd-10: cve-2012-0217
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
677299: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b
tags 677299 + fixed-upstream
thanks
Wow, so this is the mysterious embargoed Xen issue that a Linode
announcement hinted at 4 weeks ago. The CVE not only affected Xen PV
hosts (XSA-7), but MS Windows (MS12‑042) and now FreeBSD (SA-12:04).
kfreebsd-10 is fixed upstream in r236953 so this just nee
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the src:openblas package:
#677165: openblas: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: gemm.c:401:16: error:
'GEMM_MULTITHREAD_THRESHOLD' undeclared (first use in this function)
It has been closed by Sylvestre Ledru .
Their explanation
18 matches
Mail list logo
