Bug#661825: do we need to provide keymaps in kbdcontrol?

2012-04-27 Thread Robert Millan
Hi all, I have the impression that everything needed to handle keyboard properly on GNU/kFreeBSD is already in place: - keyboard-configuration provides the user setting (maybe fed from D-I) and /etc/init.d/keyboard-setup - In turn, /etc/init.d/keyboard-setup uses /bin/setupcon from console-setup

Re: svn commit: r234684 - head/lib/libusb

2012-04-27 Thread Robert Millan
El 26 d’abril de 2012 23:55, Hans Petter Selasky ha escrit: >> By linux libusb do you mean the one from http://www.libusb.org/ ? >> AFAIK this one is a portable library, at least it builds on >> GNU/kFreeBSD too. > > The one from libusb.org does not work under FreeBSD. Can you be more specific ab

Bug#669308 closed by Gustavo Noronha Silva (Bug#669308: fixed in webkit 1.8.1-1)

2012-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the src:webkit package: #669308: webkit: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: #error Unsupported Platform It has been closed by Gustavo Noronha Silva . Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. If this exp

Re: defaulting to GCC-4.7 for kfreebsd and the hurd?

2012-04-27 Thread Matthias Klose
On 27.04.2012 15:03, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 27/04/12 13:31, Matthias Klose wrote: >> I'm now planning to default to GCC 4.7 for amd64 and i386. Should kfreebsd >> and >> the hurd do change at the same time, or should these stay with 4.6? > > In case it is relevant to this decision: > >

Re: defaulting to GCC-4.7 for kfreebsd and the hurd?

2012-04-27 Thread Samuel Thibault
Matthias Klose, le Fri 27 Apr 2012 15:07:12 +0200, a écrit : > On 27.04.2012 14:44, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Matthias Klose, le Fri 27 Apr 2012 14:31:16 +0200, a écrit : > >> I'm now planning to default to GCC 4.7 for amd64 and i386. Should > >> kfreebsd and > >> the hurd do change at the same

Re: defaulting to GCC-4.7 for kfreebsd and the hurd?

2012-04-27 Thread Matthias Klose
On 27.04.2012 14:44, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Matthias Klose, le Fri 27 Apr 2012 14:31:16 +0200, a écrit : >> I'm now planning to default to GCC 4.7 for amd64 and i386. Should kfreebsd >> and >> the hurd do change at the same time, or should these stay with 4.6? > > I have actually already commi

Re: defaulting to GCC-4.7 for kfreebsd and the hurd?

2012-04-27 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 27/04/12 13:31, Matthias Klose wrote: > I'm now planning to default to GCC 4.7 for amd64 and i386. Should kfreebsd > and > the hurd do change at the same time, or should these stay with 4.6? In case it is relevant to this decision: gcc-4.6 has been failing to build on kfreebsd-* since the en

Re: defaulting to GCC-4.7 for kfreebsd and the hurd?

2012-04-27 Thread Samuel Thibault
Matthias Klose, le Fri 27 Apr 2012 14:31:16 +0200, a écrit : > I'm now planning to default to GCC 4.7 for amd64 and i386. Should kfreebsd > and > the hurd do change at the same time, or should these stay with 4.6? I have actually already commited the switch to gcc4.7 for the hurd package. I bel

defaulting to GCC-4.7 for kfreebsd and the hurd?

2012-04-27 Thread Matthias Klose
Hi, I'm now planning to default to GCC 4.7 for amd64 and i386. Should kfreebsd and the hurd do change at the same time, or should these stay with 4.6? Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.