Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 658677 + pending
Bug #658677 [kfreebsd-9] [kfreebsd-image-9] Please enable pflog device by
default
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
658677: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
Hi!
Just an interesting Gem I noticed. `zpool list -o version` tells me my
pool is at version 28 while `zdb` thinks it's version 15.
Regards
Christoph
--
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
On 10/02/12 16:57, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2012/2/6, Dererk :
>> That was easy! :-)
>> As you mention, removing the patch did work as expected and nicely! Thanks!
>>
>> I'll let tcpdump guys know about this so we can, altogether when this
>> issue is solved, this quite relevant kbsd feature working
On 10/02/12 16:57, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2012/2/6, Dererk :
>> That was easy! :-)
>> As you mention, removing the patch did work as expected and nicely! Thanks!
>>
>> I'll let tcpdump guys know about this so we can, altogether when this
>> issue is solved, this quite relevant kbsd feature working
El 5 de febrer de 2012 14:57, Petr Salinger ha escrit:
>> You're missing a bigger part of the problem: fixing runtime problems
>> in userland that are only exposed by kfreebsd-9.
>
> There might be similar problems with using backported parts in 8.x.
The impact of that is very much smaller. For
2012/2/6, Dererk :
> That was easy! :-)
> As you mention, removing the patch did work as expected and nicely! Thanks!
>
> I'll let tcpdump guys know about this so we can, altogether when this
> issue is solved, this quite relevant kbsd feature working in time for
> wheezy.
So what else is needed?
2012/2/6, Rene Engelhard :
>> This issue also hits BOINC. I got a reply from Robert Millan yesterday
>> where he said that this would already be fixed in SVN. No dates given.
>
> ah, indeed:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2012/02/msg00032.html
>
> Sorry for the duplicate.
>
> A ETA would be
2012/2/9, Guillem Jover :
> Yes, this was filed before several times (see 630203 and 655865 :),
> but ended up being a glibc issue, fixed in latest upload, so I guess
> you just need to update the chroot.
At least part of it, yes. Note that you still need to include
before this header.
(in case
Hi all,
I appreciate everyone's interest in this matter, but it's completely
unrelated to bug #651624.
So please drop 651...@bugs.debian.org from CC, thanks!
2012/2/10, Benjamin Kaduk :
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2012, Hannes wrote:
>
>>
>> I was under the impression that the ZFS kernel code in FreeBSD is
9 matches
Mail list logo
