Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Can I instead suggest someone looks at the kernel and fixes it?
It used to work, it works on the porter machines, it just fails
on the buidds.
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
The kernel part is not trivial to solve.
It now fails because of the multiple bind mounts needed by schroot
devd_9.0-1_kfreebsd-i386.deb
to main/f/freebsd-utils/devd_9.0-1_kfreebsd-i386.deb
freebsd-geom_9.0-1_kfreebsd-i386.deb
to main/f/freebsd-utils/freebsd-geom_9.0-1_kfreebsd-i386.deb
freebsd-net-tools-udeb_9.0-1_kfreebsd-i386.udeb
to main/f/freebsd-utils/freebsd-net-tools-udeb_9.0-1_kfreebsd-i38
On 2012-02-02 22:48 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> El 2 de febrer de 2012 19:20, Sven Joachim ha escrit:
>> If there is anything else you want me to do, please speak up.
>
> If you ship a new terminfo that matches FreeBSD one and give it a
> different name, would this allow FreeBSD 9 users with De
freebsd-utils_9.0-1_kfreebsd-i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
freebsd-utils_9.0-1.dsc
freebsd-utils_9.0.orig.tar.gz
freebsd-utils_9.0-1.debian.tar.gz
freebsd-utils_9.0-1_kfreebsd-i386.deb
freebsd-utils-udeb_9.0-1_kfreebsd-i386.udeb
kldutils_9.0-1_kfr
El 2 de febrer de 2012 19:20, Sven Joachim ha escrit:
> If there is anything else you want me to do, please speak up.
If you ship a new terminfo that matches FreeBSD one and give it a
different name, would this allow FreeBSD 9 users with Debian
GNU/kFreeBSD chroots to fix the problem with "TERM=x
El 2 de febrer de 2012 18:54, Aurelien Jarno ha escrit:
>> We need the rebuild for ABI transition anyway, so it's no harm to
>> queue it right away.
>>
>
> Does it mean that after a rebuild, it won't work anymore with a kernel
> 8.x?
Probably. After several hours I've given up trying to make user
Hi,
for the next upload of ncurses I have updated¹ the xterm* terminfo
entries from xterm 276. One notable feature is that there is now a
single entry point for configuring the behavior of the backspace key²,
meaning that all xterm-* terminfo entries behave consistently in that
respect.
The down
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 06:28:52PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
> El 2 de febrer de 2012 18:27, Robert Millan ha escrit:
> > I believe that a rebuild of smartmontools with libcam-dev 9.0 (just
> > accepted into unstable) would solve the problem.
> >
> > Could someone test?
>
> We need the rebuild
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 06:28:52PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
> El 2 de febrer de 2012 18:27, Robert Millan ha escrit:
> > I believe that a rebuild of smartmontools with libcam-dev 9.0 (just
> > accepted into unstable) would solve the problem.
> >
> > Could someone test?
>
> We need the rebuild
El 2 de febrer de 2012 18:27, Robert Millan ha escrit:
> I believe that a rebuild of smartmontools with libcam-dev 9.0 (just
> accepted into unstable) would solve the problem.
>
> Could someone test?
We need the rebuild for ABI transition anyway, so it's no harm to
queue it right away.
--
Rober
Hi,
El 31 de gener de 2012 22:06, Samuel Moritz ha escrit:
> root@debian:/# smartctl -a /dev/ad0
> smartctl 5.41 2011-06-09 r3365 [GNU/kFreeBSD 9.0-1-amd64 x86_64] (local build)
> Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net
> error sending CAMIOCOMMAND ioctl: Inappr
Accepted:
freebsd-libs_9.0-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_9.0-1.debian.tar.gz
freebsd-libs_9.0-1.dsc
to main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_9.0-1.dsc
freebsd-libs_9.0.orig.tar.gz
to main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_9.0.orig.tar.gz
libalias-dev_9.0-1_kfreebsd-i386.deb
to
12 matches
Mail list logo
