Hello,
On 11/12/11 17:38, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/12/11 Arno Töll :
>> Back then I assumed that was quite intentional as upgrading to a 8.3
>> kernel solved the problem. That's why we added breaks conditions to the
>> package back then. Aside of this problem there didn't seem to be a hard
>> (
Hi,
> 2011/12/11 Robert Millan :
>> It seems the default is still zfsutils-udeb 8.2
>> for debian-cd images (netinst, businesscard) but not for netboot.
Did you mean 8.3? That's what I see the latest netinst/businesscard
images try to use, regardless of which kernel is used during install.
Your
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2011 18:43:40 +0100
with message-id
and subject line not a bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #651719,
regarding new ZFS installs completely broken in Wheezy/Sid
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
2011/12/11 Arno Töll :
> Back then I assumed that was quite intentional as upgrading to a 8.3
> kernel solved the problem. That's why we added breaks conditions to the
> package back then. Aside of this problem there didn't seem to be a hard
> (i.e. API or ABI) incompatibility which would have caus
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 651719 grave
Bug #651719 [zfsutils] new ZFS installs completely broken in Wheezy/Sid
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
651719: http://bugs.debian.org/c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On 11.12.2011 18:05, Robert Millan wrote:
> For the record, the symptoms of this are that /dev/zvol/* device nodes
> aren't being created, and therefore creating a pool and new file
> systems doesn't make new devices appear in partman GUI.
Tha
2011/12/11 Robert Millan :
> 1- kfreebsd-8 images can't currently be used to install *anything*
> when zfsutils-udeb 8.3 is being used, i.e. when they fetch their
> packages from sid. It seems the default is still zfsutils-udeb 8.2
> for debian-cd images (netinst, businesscard) but not for netboot
Package: partman-zfs
Severity: grave
2011/12/11 Robert Millan :
> 2.3- /boot/zfs/zpool.cache is NOT present!! No idea why this
> happens, but potentially it could also break installed systems (since
> they attempt to boot using outdated /boot/zfs/zpool.cache that was
> generated with older ZFS
Package: zfsutils
Version: 8.3~svn226546-6
2011/12/11 Robert Millan :
> 2.2- zfsutils 8.2 in /target with a kfreebsd-9 runtime breaks
> grub-install (even if zfsutils-udeb is 8.3). Will be fixed when
> zfsutils 8.3 migrates.
Actually, this is much worse. Even 8.3 zfsutils (or zfsutils-udeb)
h
My current summary:
1- kfreebsd-8 images can't currently be used to install *anything*
when zfsutils-udeb 8.3 is being used, i.e. when they fetch their
packages from sid. It seems the default is still zfsutils-udeb 8.2
for debian-cd images (netinst, businesscard) but not for netboot.
2- kfreebsd
2011/12/11 Arno Töll :
> On 11.12.2011 17:04, Robert Millan wrote:
>> Thanks. I just filed a bug on ftp.d.o.
>
> britney will still not let you migrate then, as you filed a RC bug
> yourself to prevent exactly that migration. :)
I know. Migration needs to happen at the same time as kfreebsd-9,
ne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On 11.12.2011 17:04, Robert Millan wrote:
> Thanks. I just filed a bug on ftp.d.o.
britney will still not let you migrate then, as you filed a RC bug
yourself to prevent exactly that migration. :)
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemon
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Some are NBS because soname was bumped (0 -> 1), and the -dev ones are NBS
because they've been intentionally removed since they're not usable for
external applications to link with.
We can't wait for automated removal because of the ongoing transition fro
2011/12/11 Cyril Brulebois :
> See NBS on http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
>
> If you are in a hurry and can't wait for the semi-automatic decruft
> sessions, file a bug to get them removed.
Thanks. I just filed a bug on ftp.d.o.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bs
2011/12/11 Steven Chamberlain :
> * I managed to install to a new ZFS root under kfreebsd 8.2, upgrade to
> kfreebsd 9 and still boot it; so what did we do differently for
> Christoph to have this issue?
Hard to say. It's probably just not reproducible every time, or
depends on factors that can'
Robert Millan (11/12/2011):
> excuses.php claims zfsutils is out of date but this isn't true.
> zfsutils removed a few binary packages recently, these are not out of
> date, they just aren't meant to be present anymore:
That's called “out of date” until removal.
> http://qa.debian.org/excuses.ph
excuses.php claims zfsutils is out of date but this isn't true.
zfsutils removed a few binary packages recently, these are not out of
date, they just aren't meant to be present anymore:
http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=zfsutils
Will this prevent migration?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSU
Hi,
On 11/12/11 12:03, Robert Millan wrote:
> Please don't add unrelated information to bug reports. If you found a
> new bug, you can file it, or we can discuss it in the mailing list(s).
Okay sorry, some of that I ought to file separate bugs for, but
regarding this bug I was really trying to s
Hi Steven,
Please don't add unrelated information to bug reports. If you found a
new bug, you can file it, or we can discuss it in the mailing list(s).
I replaced the CC to BTS with debian-bsd.
2011/12/11 Steven Chamberlain :
> which only has kfreebsd-image-8.2-1-amd64 8.2-15 (I guess because
>
2011/12/10 Christoph Egger :
> The official 9.0 kernel manages to mount the root fs
Maybe they've fixed this bug recently. I just uploaded a new SVN
snapshot to experimental (9.0~svn228246-1), can you try?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
20 matches
Mail list logo
