freebsd-smbfs_9.0~svn227117-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: freebsd-smbfs_9.0~svn227117-2.debian.tar.gz to main/f/freebsd-smbfs/freebsd-smbfs_9.0~svn227117-2.debian.tar.gz freebsd-smbfs_9.0~svn227117-2.dsc to main/f/freebsd-smbfs/freebsd-smbfs_9.0~svn227117-2.dsc freebsd-smbfs_9.0~svn227117-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-smbfs/fre

Processing of freebsd-smbfs_9.0~svn227117-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes

freebsd-smbfs_9.0~svn227117-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: freebsd-smbfs_9.0~svn227117-2.dsc freebsd-smbfs_9.0~svn227117-2.debian.tar.gz freebsd-smbfs_9.0~svn227117-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running

Re: Should the ITP for freebsd-quota be reassigned?

lördag den 12 november 2011 klockan 00:36 skrev Robert Millan detta: > 2011/11/11 Mats Erik Andersson : > > Dear all, > > > > I am reviving an old inquiry since it is not clear to me > > what has happened. > > Could you point to the log for the complete conversation? Is this > from BTS or a threa

Re: Should the ITP for freebsd-quota be reassigned?

2011/11/11 Mats Erik Andersson : > Dear all, > > I am reviving an old inquiry since it is not clear to me > what has happened. Could you point to the log for the complete conversation? Is this from BTS or a thread in this mailing list? -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-

freebsd-utils_8.2+ds2-10_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: devd_8.2+ds2-10_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-utils/devd_8.2+ds2-10_kfreebsd-amd64.deb freebsd-geom_8.2+ds2-10_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-utils/freebsd-geom_8.2+ds2-10_kfreebsd-amd64.deb freebsd-net-tools-udeb_8.2+ds2-10_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb to main/f/freebsd-util

Bug#643840: marked as done (setting SGID on netstat)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Nov 2011 22:48:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#643840: fixed in freebsd-utils 8.2+ds2-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #643840, regarding setting SGID on netstat to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Bug#638917: marked as done (freebsd-utils: Add kbdcontrol-udeb)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Nov 2011 22:48:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#638917: fixed in freebsd-utils 8.2+ds2-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #638917, regarding freebsd-utils: Add kbdcontrol-udeb to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Re: Should the ITP for freebsd-quota be reassigned?

Dear all, I am reviving an old inquiry since it is not clear to me what has happened. tisdag den 7 juni 2011 klockan 21:31 skrev Guillem Jover detta: > On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 21:24:02 +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > > tisdag den 7 juni 2011 klockan 21:11 skrev Guillem Jover detta: > > > On T

freebsd-utils_8.2+ds2-10_kfreebsd-amd64.changes is NEW

devd_8.2+ds2-10_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-utils/devd_8.2+ds2-10_kfreebsd-amd64.deb freebsd-geom_8.2+ds2-10_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-utils/freebsd-geom_8.2+ds2-10_kfreebsd-amd64.deb freebsd-net-tools-udeb_8.2+ds2-10_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb to main/f/freebsd-utils/freebsd-net

Processing of freebsd-utils_8.2+ds2-10_kfreebsd-amd64.changes

freebsd-utils_8.2+ds2-10_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: freebsd-utils_8.2+ds2-10.dsc freebsd-utils_8.2+ds2-10.debian.tar.gz freebsd-utils_8.2+ds2-10_kfreebsd-amd64.deb freebsd-utils-udeb_8.2+ds2-10_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb kldutils_8.2+ds2-10_k

Processed: tagging 638917

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 638917 + pending Bug #638917 [freebsd-utils] freebsd-utils: Add kbdcontrol-udeb Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 638917: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6

Bug#612600: iscsi initiator userspace tooling missing

Hi, A userland implementation of iSCSI server for GNU/kFreeBSD is now available (package "istgt"). Of course, this doesn't preclude someone from packaging the FreeBSD iSCSI initiator. But personally I don't think it's worth the effort, at least right now (our manpower is very limited). -- Robe

Processed: tagging 643840

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 643840 + pending Bug #643840 [freebsd-utils] setting SGID on netstat Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 643840: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643840 Debia

Processed: retitle 577494 to include ktrdump and vmstat

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 577494 include ktrdump and vmstat Bug #577494 [freebsd-utils] include ktrdump, vmstat and ppp Changed Bug title to 'include ktrdump and vmstat' from 'include ktrdump, vmstat and ppp' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me i

Processed: reassign 625474 to ktrace

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 625474 ktrace Bug #625474 [freebsd-utils] freebsd-utils: kdump segfaults on unknown signals Bug reassigned from package 'freebsd-utils' to 'ktrace'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions freebsd-utils/8.1-4. > thanks Stopping processi

Re: Bug#648246: fdm: FTBFS(kfreebsd): Unable to configure for GNU/kFreeBSD

2011/11/11 Frank Terbeck : > Fine by me. Do you happen to know whether this actually fixes the build > on kfreebsd? If it does I'll fix the package and forward a patch > upstream. The rest of the blob is OK but mremap() is Linux-specific. Here's a fixed patch (tested and known to build). Btw, in

Re: Bug#648246: fdm: FTBFS(kfreebsd): Unable to configure for GNU/kFreeBSD

Robert Millan wrote: > 2011/11/9 Frank Terbeck : >> +    Linux|GNU/k*BSD) > > Maybe better use: > > Linux|GNU|GNU/*) > > this way it works on GNU/Hurd and possibly other GNU-ish systems. Fine by me. Do you happen to know whether this actually fixes the build on kfreebsd? If it does I'll fix the pa

Re: Bug#648246: fdm: FTBFS(kfreebsd): Unable to configure for GNU/kFreeBSD

2011/11/9 Frank Terbeck : > -    Linux) > +    Linux|GNU/k*BSD) Maybe better use: Linux|GNU|GNU/*) this way it works on GNU/Hurd and possibly other GNU-ish systems. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont

Re: Bug#648432: Fails to install on kfreebsd-*

On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:35:01 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: I think it is fair to try once... I've given back gnustep-dl2 on kfreebsd-amd64. If it builds fine there, I'll do the same for kfreebsd-i386 and close this bug. It built sucessfully on both kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 now. Thus, c

Re: Bug#648432: Fails to install on kfreebsd-*

On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:22:33 +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 03:10:16PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: Package: gnustep-back-common Version: 0.20.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy It seems that gnustep-back-common fails to install in sid on kfreebsd-* machines. This has b

Bug#648432: Fails to install on kfreebsd-*

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 03:10:16PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > Package: gnustep-back-common > Version: 0.20.1-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid wheezy > It seems that gnustep-back-common fails to install in sid on > kfreebsd-* machines. This has been noticed while trying to build > gnustep-dl2 [1

Bug#648432: Fails to install on kfreebsd-*

Package: gnustep-back-common Version: 0.20.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy Hi. It seems that gnustep-back-common fails to install in sid on kfreebsd-* machines. This has been noticed while trying to build gnustep-dl2 [1]. I'm not sure what the problem is, since I don't have access to any b