(forw) Debian installer failed builds

2011-10-30 Thread Christian PERRIER
Hello, I'm sorry for sending this only now, but it seems that kfreebsd-amd64 builds of D-I are failing for about 2 weeks with the following message. I suspect this might be related to changes in kernel in kfreebsd-amd64 (udebs not rebuilt?) but this is only wild guess. get-packages udeb acpi-modu

Processed: Re: Bug#646518: ufsutils: Wrong superblock after mkfs.ufs

2011-10-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 646518 patch Bug #646518 [ufsutils] ufsutils: Wrong superblock after mkfs.ufs Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 646518: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646518

Bug#646518: ufsutils: Wrong superblock after mkfs.ufs

2011-10-30 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
tag 646518 patch thanks On 24.10.2011 20:23, phcoder wrote: > Package: ufsutils > Version: 8.2-2 > Severity: normal > Tags: d-i > > The superblock is wrong when using mkfs.ufs. The magic 1901 5419 is at > 0x00105b0 instead of 0x001055c as it is with FreeBSD newfs. > Investigation shows that this i

Bug#646957: "mount -o remount,rw" has no effect with kFreeBSD 9.0

2011-10-30 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 02:27:53PM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: On Sat, 29 Oct 2011, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/29 Aurelien Jarno : Which seems to be kfreebsd-9 related, not busybox related. This is very likely to be the same bug than the one fix

kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn226626-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2011-10-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn226626-2.debian.tar.gz to main/k/kfreebsd-9/kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn226626-2.debian.tar.gz kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn226626-2.dsc to main/k/kfreebsd-9/kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn226626-2.dsc kfreebsd-headers-9-amd64_9.0~svn226626-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/k/kfreebsd-9/kfreebsd-hea

Processing of kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn226626-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes

2011-10-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters
kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn226626-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn226626-2.dsc kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn226626-2.debian.tar.gz kfreebsd-source-9.0_9.0~svn226626-2_all.deb kfreebsd-headers-9.0-0_9.0~svn226626-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb kfreebs

Bug#605065: marked as done (kfreebsd-image-8.1-1-amd64: Delete key does not delete the character to the right of the cursor)

2011-10-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 30 Oct 2011 22:18:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#605065: fixed in kfreebsd-9 9.0~svn226626-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #605065, regarding kfreebsd-image-8.1-1-amd64: Delete key does not delete the character to the right of the cursor to be marked as d

Re: Bug#637236: gcc-4.6/gcj-4.6 build failures on kfreebsd-amd64 are back again

2011-10-30 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Robert Millan writes: >> Matthias tried to disable parallel builds on kfreebsd-*: >> >> ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_TARGET_ARCH), kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386)) >>  USE_NJOBS = no >> endif >> >> but it looks like the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS on fano overrode him: >> >> # Support parallel= in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

Re: Call for testing: Fix for DELETE / BACKSPACE problems in experimental

2011-10-30 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2011-10-30 19:38 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2011-10-30 18:34 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > >> 2011/10/30 Sven Joachim : >> >>> Overall xterm seems like a nice improvement over cons25(-debian), the >>> only problem is that Emacs apparently sets up colors for a light >>> background, resultin

Re: Call for testing: Fix for DELETE / BACKSPACE problems in experimental

2011-10-30 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2011-10-30 18:34 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > 2011/10/30 Sven Joachim : > >> Overall xterm seems like a nice improvement over cons25(-debian), the >> only problem is that Emacs apparently sets up colors for a light >> background, resulting in minibuffer prompts that are barely readable >> (dar

Re: Call for testing: Fix for DELETE / BACKSPACE problems in experimental

2011-10-30 Thread brian m. carlson
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 06:34:45PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > 2011/10/30 Sven Joachim : > Connecting to FreeBSD works (FreeBSD has kbs=^H, but its userland-side > of this is more tollerant and accepts 0x7F as well). > > I don't know about others. Anyone can check? I no longer have a kFreeBSD V

Re: Call for testing: Fix for DELETE / BACKSPACE problems in experimental

2011-10-30 Thread Robert Millan
2011/10/30 Sven Joachim : > Seems to work fine, although I haven't tested what happens when you > connect to non-Debian systems which have kbs=^H in the xterm terminfo. Connecting to FreeBSD works (FreeBSD has kbs=^H, but its userland-side of this is more tollerant and accepts 0x7F as well). I do

Processed: Re: Bug#646918: /usr/include/sys/nlist_aout.h:51: error: redefinition of ���struct nlist’

2011-10-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 646918 kfreebsd-kernel-headers Bug #646918 [libc0.1-dev] /usr/include/sys/nlist_aout.h:51: error: redefinition of ‘struct nlist’ Bug reassigned from package 'libc0.1-dev' to 'kfreebsd-kernel-headers'. Bug No longer marked as found in

Re: Call for testing: Fix for DELETE / BACKSPACE problems in experimental

2011-10-30 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2011-10-30 02:43 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > The fixes for DELETE / BACKSPACE issues in local console, which were > added by Aurelien and Petr a while ago but due to a variety of reasons > couldn't make it to the release, have been restored and are available > again. The following are needed