Re: LVM support

2011-10-12 Thread Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
Hi On Thursday 13 October 2011, Zac Slade wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote: > > My first attempts (/ on lvm2, using MSDOS partition tables, no separate > > /boot/) have not been successful yet (when trying to write the > > bootsector), but I may not have lef

Re: [pkg-wpa-devel] Bug#644823: uninstallable on kfreebsd-* (depends on uninstallable libpcap0.8 from non-udeb land)

2011-10-12 Thread Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
Hi On Thursday 13 October 2011, Robert Millan wrote: > Package: wpasupplicant-udeb > Version: 0.7.3-4 > Severity: grave > Tags: d-i > > $ LANG=C fakeroot make build_monolithic > [...] > wpasupplicant-udeb:kfreebsd-i386 Depends on libpcap0.8 [ kfreebsd-i386 ] < > none > ( none ) can't be satisf

Re: LVM support

2011-10-12 Thread Zac Slade
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote: > My first attempts (/ on lvm2, using MSDOS partition tables, no separate > /boot/) have not been successful yet (when trying to write the > bootsector), but I may not have left enough space for the embedding > area or confused it by

Re: LVM support

2011-10-12 Thread Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
Hi On Thursday 13 October 2011, Robert Millan wrote: > 2011/10/2 Stefan Lippers-Hollmann : > > [ Unrelated to this, I have been playing with the idea of doing a > > kFreeBSD-amd64/ unstable installation on real hardware, to allow me > > some further wpasupplicant (or lirc) testing, but all of my

Re: Please test zfsutils 9.0~svn226163-1

2011-10-12 Thread Robert Millan
Hi, I remembered that ZFS v28 support was also merged in 8-STABLE upstream branch. Maybe it would be better to upgrade zfsutils to 8-STABLE first? Based on kernel-side experience I guess most of your work also applies there. My guess is also that 8-STABLE zfsutils with v28 support would work fi

Bug#644417: CPU-faults early on boot

2011-10-12 Thread Robert Millan
2011/10/10 Petr Salinger : > The main problem is that we do not know whether gcc-4.x > miscompiles kernel or kernel is not properly coded. Agreed. I'll do more testing and investigate. In the meantime I've uploaded a gcc-4.5 built kfreebsd to experimental, so that this combination can be tested

kFreeBSD 8.2 built with GCC 4.5 (please test)

2011-10-12 Thread Robert Millan
Hi, Following #644417 I've reverted kFreeBSD 8.2 builds to use GCC 4.4 with -fno-gcse flag, which was the only combination that fixed the regression my my hardware. Reenabling -fgcse would require finding and fixing a bug either in kFreeBSD or in GCC, so far it is unknown which one. Reenabling