Hi Cristoph,
2011/7/17 Christoph Egger :
> 21:29 0 % sudo chmod 666 /dev/fuse0
I tried that too ;-)
> 21:29 1 % gphotofs ~/mnt
> mount_fusefs: /dev/fuse0 on /home/christoph/mnt: Operation not permitted
I don't think this is intended to work. I haven't checked the code,
but I suspect supporting
Package: fuse4bsd
Version: 0.3.9~pre1.20080208-3
Severity: important
christoph@chillida ~
21:27 1 % sudo kldload fuse
Passwort:
christoph@chillida ~
21:27 0 % sudo kldstat
Id Refs AddressSize Name
19 0x8020 c66000 kfreebsd-8.2-1-amd64.gz
21 0x812
Package: encfs
Version: 1.7.4-2.2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi,
encfs fails to build on kfreebsd-amd64 due to incomplete Architecture
list and unconditional dependency on fuse-utils.
Please consider the attached patch to correct the problem.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/s
Package: fuse-convmvfs
Version: 0.2.6-1.1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
fuse-convmvfs fails to build on kfreebsd-amd64 due to incomplete Architecture
list and unconditional dependency on fuse-utils.
Please consider the attached patch to
Accepted:
kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn224126-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/k/kfreebsd-9/kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn224126-1.debian.tar.gz
kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn224126-1.dsc
to main/k/kfreebsd-9/kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn224126-1.dsc
kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn224126.orig.tar.gz
to main/k/kfreebsd-9/kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn224126.orig.tar.gz
On 07/17/2011 12:43 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
>> I think I'll patch S3QL to fall back on umount if fusermount is not
>> available and depend on fuse | fuse4bsd. This should work fine, because
>> then if the user was able to mount the file system on BSD he must have
>> been root, and using umount ins
kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn224126-1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn224126-1.dsc
kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn224126.orig.tar.gz
kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn224126-1.debian.tar.gz
kfreebsd-source-9.0_9.0~svn224126-1_all.deb
kfreebsd-headers-9.0-0_9.0~s
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jul 2011 17:50:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#633618: fixed in kfreebsd-9 9.0~svn224126-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #633618,
regarding fails to boot on qemu (hardware error: level sensitive irq not
supported)
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jul 2011 17:50:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630784: fixed in kfreebsd-9 9.0~svn224126-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #630784,
regarding breaks kbdcontrol 8.2 (incompatible 9.x ABI)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn224126-1.debian.tar.gz
kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn224126-1.dsc
kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn224126.orig.tar.gz
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
Ok, thanks for suggestions.
Hope, the optimal solution will be found.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CALF6qJnB73EY-DijF73OvXGueS13kchUN=pqp6knee
2011/7/17 Nikolaus Rath :
>> No. non-root users can't use FUSE at all.
>
> I guess you mean non-root users can't use FUSE on BSD kernels, it
> certainly works on Linux.
Right, that's what I meant.
> I think I'll patch S3QL to fall back on umount if fusermount is not
> available and depend on fus
Robert Millan writes:
> 2011/7/17 Nikolaus Rath :
>>> Unmounting is done via umount command as with normal filesystems.
>>
>> Does that also work for non-root users?
>
> No. non-root users can't use FUSE at all.
I guess you mean non-root users can't use FUSE on BSD kernels, it
certainly works on
2011/7/16 Ed Schouten :
> I've attached a patch that should restore binary compatibility. I first
> thought this wasn't really needed, because most applications would use
> K_RAW instead of K_XLATE anyway.
>
> Just breaking binary compatibility with kbdcontrol(1) wouldn't have been
> too bad, but i
2011/7/17 Lionel Le Folgoc :
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the patch. But the issue isn't that it builds fine, rather to
> be sure that it works. I think I remember this was the reason why we
> didn't add it a few months ago.
>
> Could you by chance test the package on kfreebsd-amd64?
Actually, I can't. I
Accepted:
fuse4bsd-dkms_0.3.9~pre1.20080208-4_all.deb
to main/f/fuse4bsd/fuse4bsd-dkms_0.3.9~pre1.20080208-4_all.deb
fuse4bsd_0.3.9~pre1.20080208-4.debian.tar.gz
to main/f/fuse4bsd/fuse4bsd_0.3.9~pre1.20080208-4.debian.tar.gz
fuse4bsd_0.3.9~pre1.20080208-4.dsc
to main/f/fuse4bsd/fuse4bsd_0
fuse4bsd_0.3.9~pre1.20080208-4_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
fuse4bsd_0.3.9~pre1.20080208-4.dsc
fuse4bsd_0.3.9~pre1.20080208-4.debian.tar.gz
fuse4bsd_0.3.9~pre1.20080208-4_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
fuse4bsd-dkms_0.3.9~pre1.20080208-4_all.deb
Gree
Package: ufsutils
Version: 8.2-1
Severity: normal
rmh@dimoni:~$ sudo zfs create -V 4g dimoni-ad0s1/ufs
rmh@dimoni:~$ sudo mkfs.ufs /dev/zvol/dimoni-ad0s1/ufs
mkfs.ufs: /dev/zvol/dimoni-ad0s1/ufs: could not find special device
The zvol is otherwise usable (for swap or other filesystems). This mi
2011/7/17 Nikolaus Rath :
>> Unmounting is done via umount command as with normal filesystems.
>
> Does that also work for non-root users?
No. non-root users can't use FUSE at all.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
2011/7/17 Anton Gladky :
> [1]
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/freecad.git;a=blob;f=src/3rdParty/salomesmesh/src/SMDS/SMDS_Mesh.cpp;h=08d1b66958c089e84b2e0e468b7a34f2bae58106;hb=HEAD#l68
The code you quoted just fills the structure, below it's using it to
query free
It is for FreeCAD [1]:
struct sysinfo si;
int err = sysinfo( &si );
if ( err )
return -1;
static int limit = -1;
if ( limit < 0 ) {
int status = system("SMDS_MemoryLimit"); // it returns lower limit
of free RAM
if (status >= 0 ) {
limit = WEXITSTATUS(status);
}
Package: libc0.1
Version: 2.13-10
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
It's a bit strange, because the buildds didn't seem to have this problem,
but eglibc 2.13-10 fails to build on kfreebsd-amd64 due to testsuite errors.
(this is pristine eglibc 2.13-10, without any of my local c
2011/7/17 Petr Salinger :
> The GNU/kFreeBSD does not have "struct sysinfo" at all.
Anton, there are usually suitable replacements. What did you need sysinfo for?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
I have a very simple code:
=
#include
int main() {
struct sysinfo si;
}
=
On KFreebsd it fails and causes FTBFS:
s.cpp:5:18: error: aggregate ?main()::sysinfo si? has incomplete type
and cannot be defined
On other systems it compiles without errors.
What can be a problem in?
Hi, all
I have a very simple code:
=
#include
int main() {
struct sysinfo si;
}
=
On KFreebsd it fails and causes FTBFS:
s.cpp:5:18: error: aggregate ‘main()::sysinfo si’ has incomplete type
and cannot be defined
On other systems it compiles without errors.
What can be a prob
25 matches
Mail list logo
