Processed: reopening 629211

2011-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 629211 Bug #629211 {Done: Michael Biebl } [kfreebsd-kernel-headers] FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: sys/mount.h:39:2: error: unknown type name u_short 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found

Bug#629211: marked as done (FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: sys/mount.h:39:2: error: unknown type name u_short)

2011-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:17:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#629211: fixed in d-conf 0.7.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #629211, regarding FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: sys/mount.h:39:2: error: unknown type name u_short to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Processed: Re: d-conf on kfreebsd

2011-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 629211 -1 Bug#629211: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: sys/mount.h:39:2: error: unknown type name u_short Bug 629211 cloned as bug 629289. > reassign 629211 kfreebsd-kernel-headers Bug #629211 [libc0.1-dev] FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: sys/mount.h:39:2: error

Re: d-conf on kfreebsd

2011-06-05 Thread Aurelien Jarno
clone 629211 -1 reassign 629211 kfreebsd-kernel-headers thanks On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 12:24:57PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > reassign 629211 libc0.1-dev > thanks > > 2011/6/5 Benjamin Kaduk : > > Please pardon my ignorance, but why is it necessary to use the > > double-underscore version of th

Processed: Re: d-conf on kfreebsd

2011-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 629211 libc0.1-dev Bug #629211 [kfreebsd-kernel-headers] FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: sys/mount.h:39:2: error: unknown type name u_short Bug reassigned from package 'kfreebsd-kernel-headers' to 'libc0.1-dev'. > thanks Stopping processing here.

Re: d-conf on kfreebsd

2011-06-05 Thread Robert Millan
reassign 629211 libc0.1-dev thanks 2011/6/5 Benjamin Kaduk : > Please pardon my ignorance, but why is it necessary to use the > double-underscore version of the types? AFAICT it's the only way to use those types in glibc headers (btw, I got confused, is a glibc header not k-k-h). _BSD_SOURCE wo

Processed: Re: d-conf on kfreebsd

2011-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 629211 -1 Bug#629211: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: sys/mount.h:39:2: error: unknown type name u_short Bug 629211 cloned as bug 629273. > reassign -1 d-conf 0.7.5-1 Bug #629273 [kfreebsd-kernel-headers] FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: sys/mount.h:39:2: error

Bug#629211: d-conf on kfreebsd

2011-06-05 Thread Petr Salinger
clone 629211 -1 reassign -1 d-conf 0.7.5-1 -- Hi. Please append following line into debian/rules of d-conf. CFLAGS+=-std=gnu99 The problem is that d-conf explicitely sets in AM_CFLAGS std=c89, I do not see any reason for doing it, namely in year 2011. Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email