Re: mprotect, SIGBUS, and SIGSEGV

2011-05-15 Thread Petr Salinger
signal is determined by the build environment, but the next part seems to contradict that. Is this just a wording problem (the first sentence missing a not?) or something more subtle? Build environment of used eglibc (MIN_KERNEL_SUPPORTED), but not build environment of your binary. Plain FreeB

Re: mprotect, SIGBUS, and SIGSEGV

2011-05-15 Thread Christoph Egger
Petr Salinger writes: >>> There is no way, signal is determined by eglibc compiled for. >>> Lets assume that your binary is compiled under squeeze. >>> Under squeeze eglibc, it will receive SIGBUS, >>> under sid eglibc it will receive SIGSEGV. >> >> I don't understand this part. Your first sentenc

Re: sysstat: iostat is unusable on kfreebsd-* (no disk-related stats)

2011-05-15 Thread Steve Schnepp
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 18:55, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > to plan some sort of work schedule. As was mentioned earlier the > prospects of upstream FreeBSD accepting an entry in linprocfs > are bright. That would be the best option for me, since any linux-centric utility would then work out of t