Bug#626422: kfreebsd-image-8.2-1-686: Can't upgrade from kfreebsd7.3

2011-05-11 Thread Petr Salinger
qemu-kfreebsd:/home/njh# apt-get install kfreebsd-image-8.2-1-686 libc0.1-i686 The following extra packages will be installed: libc0.1 The following packages will be upgraded: libc0.1 libc0.1-i686 WARNING: This version of glibc uses UMTX_OP_WAIT and UMTX_OP_WAKE syscalls that are not prese

Re: sid chroots on io and asdfasdf currently broken

2011-05-11 Thread Axel Beckert
Axel Beckert wrote: > after a dist-upgrade inside io's sid chroot, something has been > upgraded which now causes dchroot'ing into the sid chroot causes > segfaults: > > o:~# dchroot sid /bin/true > Segmentation fault > io:~# dchroot sid > Segmentation fault > io:~# > > The same happen

sid chroots on io and asdfasdf currently broken

2011-05-11 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, after a dist-upgrade inside io's sid chroot, something has been upgraded which now causes dchroot'ing into the sid chroot causes segfaults: o:~# dchroot sid /bin/true Segmentation fault io:~# dchroot sid Segmentation fault io:~# The same happens on asdfasdf, just with a bus error

Bug#626422: kfreebsd-image-8.2-1-686: Can't upgrade from kfreebsd7.3

2011-05-11 Thread Nigel Horne
Package: kfreebsd-image-8.2-1-686 Severity: normal apt-get update qemu-kfreebsd:/home/njh# apt-get install kfreebsd-image-8.2-1-686 libc0.1-i686 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libc0.

Re: sysstat: iostat is unusable on kfreebsd-* (no disk-related stats)

2011-05-11 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
Dear all! tisdag den 29 mars 2011 klockan 20:50 skrev Timo Juhani Lindfors detta: > Mats Erik Andersson writes: > > Has someone looked into this matter before yesterday? > > I've just ran iostat from FreeBSD chroot :-) What is our present status on 'iostat', or a linprocps interface to establis

Re: mprotect, SIGBUS, and SIGSEGV

2011-05-11 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 11 May 2011 07:10:41 +0200 (CEST), Petr Salinger wrote: > > Build environment of used eglibc (MIN_KERNEL_SUPPORTED), > but not build environment of your binary. > Got it, thanks. I guess there is some good reason why this doesn't change the soname of libc, since it seems to break the