-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 05/02/2011 22:39, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> Simon Paillard, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 03:30:48 +0100, a écrit :
>> On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 03:25:10AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> Wolodja Wentland, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 01:46:09 +, a écrit :
2011/2/6 Axel Beckert :
> Another question was an old one and despite everyone always tells me
> the same, I still wasn't able to follow the arguments myself and
> therefore can't repeat them properly: What exactly was the big problem
> with the approach of using the BSD libc as done until 2002 in
2011/2/6 Axel Beckert :
> * How many lines is the patch to make glibc work on kfreebsd?
The patch directory amounts to 629 lines [1]. The standalone files in
sysdeps directory amount to ~14000 SLOC [2].
> * What was the worst issue we had to fix/change to get kfreebsd
> running? (related to fre
Hi,
here are the remaining questions:
Axel Beckert wrote:
> here are a few questions which came up at my kFreeBSD talk at FOSDEM
> in the CrossDistro dev room and which I couldn't answer:
>
> [...[
>
> Björn: You had one good question which I wanted to write down, but
> then didn't do it though
Hi,
here are a few questions which came up at my kFreeBSD talk at FOSDEM
in the CrossDistro dev room and which I couldn't answer:
* How many lines is the patch to make glibc work on kfreebsd?
* What was the worst issue we had to fix/change to get kfreebsd
running? (related to freebsd/glibc, no
2011/2/6 Aurelien Jarno :
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 01:06:54PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Robert Millan (06/02/2011):
>> > Should http://glibc-bsd.alioth.debian.org/install-cd/ be removed
>> > already?
>>
>> If they only have historical value, I'd say they can be removed, but
>> you may want
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 01:06:54PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Robert Millan (06/02/2011):
> > Should http://glibc-bsd.alioth.debian.org/install-cd/ be removed
> > already?
>
> If they only have historical value, I'd say they can be removed, but
> you may want to wait for an ACK of some more
Package: gdm3
Version: 2.30.5-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After installing gnome I am unable to log in because gdm-session-worker hangs
using 100% cpu.
1. Install Debian 6.0.0 kfreebsd-i386
2. Run `apt-get install gnome`
3. Reboot and attempt to log in
The log in
Package: manpages
Version: 3.27-1
Severity: normal
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Section 4 is entirely Linux-specific. Please would you consider splitting
it into a separate package? (e.g. linux-manpages or so)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT prefers testin
Accepted:
kfreebsd-8_8.2~rc1+dfsg-0.1.diff.gz
to main/k/kfreebsd-8/kfreebsd-8_8.2~rc1+dfsg-0.1.diff.gz
kfreebsd-8_8.2~rc1+dfsg-0.1.dsc
to main/k/kfreebsd-8/kfreebsd-8_8.2~rc1+dfsg-0.1.dsc
kfreebsd-8_8.2~rc1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
to main/k/kfreebsd-8/kfreebsd-8_8.2~rc1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
kfreebsd-
Robert Millan (06/02/2011):
> Should http://glibc-bsd.alioth.debian.org/install-cd/ be removed
> already?
If they only have historical value, I'd say they can be removed, but
you may want to wait for an ACK of some more people.
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Should http://glibc-bsd.alioth.debian.org/install-cd/ be removed already?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktino+jw_khqurrsxn2cnpw
Hi folks,
xorg-server 1.9 build-depends on mesa with a version higher than the
one available in sid, and both mesa 7.9 and 7.10 FTBFS on non-Linux
for now. I'm not sure when I'll have time to work on fixing those
FTBFS, so I'd appreciate if somebody could have a look. You can send
patches to debia
13 matches
Mail list logo
