Re: ifdown and /proc/net/dev

On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 10:29:51 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Is this situation being remedied in some manner? > > I've a patch now that fixes this, I've to do some final polishing > and then I'll submit it to sysvinit. Submitted now with patch as . regards, guill

Business Guide Update 2011-2012

Ladies and Gentlemen. In order to have your company inserted in the registry of World Businesses for 2011/2012 edition, please print, complete and submit the attached form (PDF file) to the following address: Europe Business Guide P.O. BOX 2021 3500 GA, UTRECHT THE NETHERLANDS email: regis...@e

Bug#606495: freebsd-buildutils,pmake: should not conflict

Package: freebsd-buildutils,pmake Severity: wishlist It would be nice if both freebsd-buildutils and pmake did not conflict. I realize that they both ship /usr/share/mk, but perhaps it's possible to patch one or the other (or both!) to use a different location. -- System Information: Debian Relea

Re: Xterm and GNU/kFreeBSD

On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:05:04AM +0100, Mats Erik Andersson scribbled: > This malfunction is reproducible also in testing/GNU/Linux, > nothing specific to GNU/kFreeBSD here. Strangely enough > > > $ startx xterm # fails > > $ startx xvt # fails > >

Re: ifdown and /proc/net/dev

Hi! On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 15:18:22 +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > it seems to me that the linux-ism in /proc/net/dev is the > cause for a dozen errors from "ifdown" at shutdown. The > complaints are non-existent interface names. The explanation > is that "/proc/net/dev" mentions "eth0", while