> airlied_, does Fedora use --as-needed by default? Fedora 14 too?
> mattst88: yes
The naming of the options makes people easily confused.
--no-add-needed is the only option Fedora's gcc passes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Adam Goode wrote:
> On 11/14/2010 12:42 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> Please ignore me if I've misunderstood the situation, firstly.
>>
>> Both Fedora and Gentoo are using --as-needed by default now. And from
>> what I've read (google: site:blog.flameeyes.eu as-needed)
On 11/14/2010 12:42 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> Please ignore me if I've misunderstood the situation, firstly.
>
> Both Fedora and Gentoo are using --as-needed by default now. And from
> what I've read (google: site:blog.flameeyes.eu as-needed) --as-needed
> is certainly useful and prevents lots of u
2010/11/14 Werner Koch :
>> I don't have time to work on this myself. Unless someone else does,
>> I'd still recommend adding the SUID bit as a temporary solution.
>
> Might be the easiest way until we have proper disk encryption support.
Ok. Thijs, since there were no other objections, would you
[ removing 598...@bugs.debian.org as it's not relevant to the bug
report anymore ]
2010/11/14 Werner Koch :
> Last weekend I tried to port [geli] but I have a
> lack of understanding how the Debian packages are supposed to work
> together; in particular the kernel headers and the various system
>
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 21:38, r...@debian.org said:
Yeah, that is a problem. Last weekend I tried to port it but I have a
lack of understanding how the Debian packages are supposed to work
together; in particular the kernel headers and the various system
libraries like libgeom etc.
> For that we
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:51:49PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 04:19:10PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:43:57PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> > > For wheezy I'm planning to change the link
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:19:08PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> > For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs
> > (turning on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The
> > rationale is summarized in
> >
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:51:49PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 04:19:10PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:43:57PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs (turning
> > > on --as-needed and -
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 04:19:10PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:43:57PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs (turning
> > on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The rationale is
> > summarized in http:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs
> (turning on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The
> rationale is summarized in
> http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking. I would like to know
> about i
11 matches
Mail list logo
