So this (firewall/router requirement) is what brought me to kFreeBSD in
the first place and I have to say that this is not without problems.
First, I cannot run "netstat -rn" in kFreeBSD. I have yet to file a bug
on this, but it just shows how elementary communication channels between
userland an
Forosh Vpn ba gheymat monaseb va server haye Usa va Nl
Jahate daryafte account test be addresss zir email konid
email : Alborz33 @ gmail.com
1 Mahe (Usa , Nl) 3500 Toman .
3 Mahe (Usa , Nl) 9500 Toman .
6 Mahe (Usa , Nl) 17000 Toman .
12 Mahe (Usa , Nl) 29000 Toman .
jahate daryafte shomare kart
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:11:26PM -0400, Tuco wrote:
> I intend to deploy Debian GNU/kFreeBSD as a backup / NAS server. I
> think as a desktop it's still inmature but as a server it's very
> usable and has wonderful capabilities in storage
> area thanks to ZFS (for example http://www.ypass.net/sol
This one time, at band camp, Petr Salinger said:
> In the provided kdump, the child calls rfork,
> in linux it is named clone. The rest of child dump
> looks like thread manager, it is needed to also know
> trace of 7.
>
> >5 ruby1.8 CALL sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0xbfbe3af0,0xbfbe3af0)
>
Source: ruby1.9.1
Version: 1.9.2~svn28788-1
Severity: serious
Ruby's test suite fails on kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64, and then hangs.
i386:
> Loaded suite ./test/runner
> Started
> /build/buildd-ruby1.9.1_1.9.2~svn28788-1-kfreebsd-i386-8LdWDu/ruby1.9.1-1.9.2~svn28788/lib/timeout.rb:50:
> [B
(the short version - the parent forks and waitpids, and never gets a
SIGCHLD or a return from waitpid. This appears to be because the child
never exec's after the fork).
Please could test patches from my previous mails:
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 13:31:14 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 18:45:06
6 matches
Mail list logo
