Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#564651: xfce4-netload-plugin: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: net/*.h: No such file or directory

2010-01-10 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On 11/01/2010 02:23, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Package: xfce4-netload-plugin > Version: 0.4.0-3 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org > Usertags: kfreebsd > > Hi, > > as discussed on IRC, it looks like some headers got dropped, and your > package now fails

Bug#564652: openct: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: sys-bsd.c:579: error: 'struct usb_device_info' has no member named 'udi_devnames'

2010-01-10 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Package: openct Version: 0.6.19-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hi, your package now fails on kfreebsd-*, I believe due to the USB stack related changes when switching from kfreebsd-7 to kfreebsd-8: | libtool: compile: cc -DHAVE_CONFI

Bug#564651: xfce4-netload-plugin: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: net/*.h: No such file or directory

2010-01-10 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Package: xfce4-netload-plugin Version: 0.4.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hi, as discussed on IRC, it looks like some headers got dropped, and your package now fails to build: | cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..-DPACKAGE_LOCALE_DI

Re: Request for advise with struct stat, ACL, xattr, zlib

2010-01-10 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, me: > > None of the optional libraries and system > > features is used in the buildd compile runs: > > - libacl > > - support for Extended Attributes > > - zlib > > Nevertheless, the aspects of ACL and xattr are > > also porting issues. Guillem Jover: > This is a general packaging bug, there'

Re: Request for advise with struct stat, ACL, xattr, zlib (2nd try)

2010-01-10 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 19:46:36 +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > None of the optional libraries and system > features is used in the buildd compile runs: > - libacl > - support for Extended Attributes > - zlib > > At least on Linux this astonishes me. I'll have > to ask George for exploring the

Re: How to find number of processors?

2010-01-10 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 21:28:33 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 02:08:07PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > The code in question is: > > > > unsigned thread::hardware_concurrency() > > { > > #if defined(PTW32_VERSION) || defined(__hpux) > > return pthrea