Hannes a écrit :
> Am Montag, 21. September 2009 09:15:04 schrieb Petr Salinger:
>>> While the current status of Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is interesting, I
>>> was quite disappointed there is no ZFS support in it (at least any
>>> related tools).
>>> Any plans to enable this support?
>> End of http://li
Petr Salinger a écrit :
>> While the current status of Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is interesting, I was
>> quite disappointed there is no ZFS support in it (at least any related
>> tools).
>> Any plans to enable this support?
>
> End of http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2009/08/msg00130.html:
>
> If we
Am Montag, 21. September 2009 09:15:04 schrieb Petr Salinger:
> > While the current status of Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is interesting, I
> > was quite disappointed there is no ZFS support in it (at least any
> > related tools).
> > Any plans to enable this support?
>
> End of http://lists.debian.org/deb
Matthias Klose a écrit :
> Besides the open license issue, are there any objections from port
> maintainers
> to make GCC-4.4 the default?
It looks find for GNU/kFreeBSD.
> As a first step that would be a change of the default for C, C++, ObjC,
> ObjC++
> and Fortran.
>
> I'm not sure about
Hello,
Petr Salinger writes:
> Fou our specifics, take a look at our SVN repository
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/glibc-bsd/trunk/, namely
> freebsd-libs, freebsd-util. Start with target get-orig-source
> in debian/rules.
Out of curiosity, is there any plan to get the kFreeBSD port into
upstream
5 matches
Mail list logo